Dasva said:
I hope your being sarcastic and are just not an insufferable ***
I thought the sarcasm was pretty obvious.
Warwolf Belt Augments |
||
Warwolf Belt Augments
Dasva said: I hope your being sarcastic and are just not an insufferable *** I thought the sarcasm was pretty obvious. Baelorn said: Dasva said: I hope your being sarcastic and are just not an insufferable *** I thought the sarcasm was pretty obvious. Yes well there are people on here who could say that and mean every word Sylph.Durzo
Offline
Dasva said: I found this one in the augment thread. I posted this one in the augment thread and updated it on wiki when we got this, i did not get it, my friend did and it was from eraser in sky, i did mine after and got wind resist+13 lol... done like 3 more since, best one i've gotten is att+3 . . . and gf got magic eva+5 . . . i do want to keep trying to get one with acc+6 again though. I got an int and mnd+1 on my belt. Not a total fail being drk main. Though i was torn between trading wolf or penitent's. kinda wish i traded the penitents now DX.
Went to buy a few more warwolf belts to try augments, again, theyre like 100k now oO. Here's me ready to buy 5 for about 50k >.> Is the huge price rise just from fov?? Alexander.Ultrarichard
Offline
-1 Vit, +1 AGI, +2 CHR on my first ever one. Also died in the fight, (dirty additional effect >.>) if that makes any difference :o
Garudagt said: and now guys what you say? Leviathan.Antonioklaus
Offline
Quote: As you can see there is no good reason to use a Swift Belt in 2009. Stop being gimp. Gawd I have both cause my WHM can't wear V.Belt /cry Pozcat said: seipher wins the thread Slightly inferior to swift as far as sam goes, but good alternative if you don't feel like going to get one I suppose. Vegetto said: Pozcat said: seipher wins the thread Slightly inferior to swift as far as sam goes, but good alternative if you don't feel like going to get one I suppose. Not everyone plays that bandwagon job!!! Still kill for that on say nin or pld Vegetto said: Pozcat said: seipher wins the thread Slightly inferior to swift as far as sam goes, but good alternative if you don't feel like going to get one I suppose. First off, your avatar is creepy as all ***. Secondly I'd disagree. Those console based sams would drool over this, one less macro line to use up for WS macros! Haste, attack, mods for ws and ofcourse since they are 2handers, they benefit from the 2hander formula for dex and str. okay 1 less haste, woop de doo really, when you weigh the benefits. Kaioshin said: Vegetto said: Pozcat said: seipher wins the thread Slightly inferior to swift as far as sam goes, but good alternative if you don't feel like going to get one I suppose. First off, your avatar is creepy as all ***. Secondly I'd disagree. Those console based sams would drool over this, one less macro line to use up for WS macros! Haste, attack, mods for ws and ofcourse since they are 2handers, they benefit from the 2hander formula for dex and str. okay 1 less haste, woop de doo really, when you weigh the benefits. Omg I don't have to macro doesn't make warwolf better to TP in, sorry. More convenient, yes, better, no. Vegetto said: Kaioshin said: Vegetto said: Pozcat said: seipher wins the thread Slightly inferior to swift as far as sam goes, but good alternative if you don't feel like going to get one I suppose. First off, your avatar is creepy as all ***. Secondly I'd disagree. Those console based sams would drool over this, one less macro line to use up for WS macros! Haste, attack, mods for ws and ofcourse since they are 2handers, they benefit from the 2hander formula for dex and str. okay 1 less haste, woop de doo really, when you weigh the benefits. Omg I don't have to macro doesn't make warwolf better to TP in, sorry. More convenient, yes, better, no. If instead of 3 attack that was 3 acc. Then you'd have nothing to say. Vegetto said: Kaioshin said: Vegetto said: Pozcat said: seipher wins the thread Slightly inferior to swift as far as sam goes, but good alternative if you don't feel like going to get one I suppose. First off, your avatar is creepy as all ***. Secondly I'd disagree. Those console based sams would drool over this, one less macro line to use up for WS macros! Haste, attack, mods for ws and ofcourse since they are 2handers, they benefit from the 2hander formula for dex and str. okay 1 less haste, woop de doo really, when you weigh the benefits. Omg I don't have to macro doesn't make warwolf better to TP in, sorry. More convenient, yes, better, no. Convenient can be better when its a choice between that and soemthing that will make a bigger difference. Just look at all the rngs going gaga over extended the duration of a ja they had on full time as is. It does nothing but make it more convient yet people still going crazy +5 str, +5 dex(acc/crit), attack +3, > +3acc, -5att, +1 haste -for pretty much mostly everything i would think
"Convenient can be better when its a choice between that and soemthing that will make a bigger difference." Or you can macro in belt AND w/e else you were going to macro in its place. More tedious? Yes, but it is better than just fulltiming warwolf. They have macros that can change your pallet and macro book now. If you have a 2part macro at the end have it swap to another pallet and all you do is hold down CTRL or ALT (or the shoulder buttons on console) and press the confirm button twice instead of once and end the last macro w/ it changing back to your orig macro book.
"If instead of 3 attack that was 3 acc. Then you'd have nothing to say." Wrong, I'd have to say it would depend on your hitrate. Blurr said: +5 str, +5 dex(acc/crit), attack +3, > +3acc, -5att, +1 haste -for pretty much mostly everything i would think For a DoT job, definitely, but sam is generally 30% DoT and 70% ws damage. That one haste will apply to all of his dmg (helps DoT by landing more swings, and helps ws dmg because you get tp faster and will ws more times). TP'ing in str/attack is only going to help his DoT, which is only 30% of his damage. w/e % increase you get from 5 str 12 attack (Including the attack from str) gets multiplied by .3 to give you the actual increase. Which is why in particular, I said, "for sam" Nice belt, and it is about as good as a 'full time' item can be.
But even if you want to pull the lolconsole card: Looking at Seipher's SAM he will be switching the following for WS: * Head * Neck * Hands * Legs * Feet * Ring * Earring (maybe) * Neck (maybe) So when you include the /ws "XXXX" <t> line that is 7-9 lines of macros (allowing for the fact that the last two are 'maybe's). That's requires 2 macros.... Switching Swift and Warwolfs as well ALSO requires 2 macros... No reductions in the number of buttons pushed... Assuming he actually changes those maybes... or even most those. If I remember right his gear wasn't exactly optimal
Dasva said: Assuming he actually changes those maybes... or even most those. If I remember right his gear wasn't exactly optimal The screen shot is about 1/2 a page up, and unless he plans to WS in haste/accuracy gear I have listed the minimum number of items he will swap There is scope to swap his back and body too, but I left them out. And as far as the value of changing, Veg is right. Once again another perfectly good thread derailed into a bitching match about Sam... woohoo
If you lvl sam to 75 and pwn pwn with big sword you are leet. bandwagon job.
best i can do with the time i have to play lol :p
imma broke *** sam! xD as of right now i only swap my head/legs/feet/ring Arroon said: Once again another perfectly good thread derailed into a bitching match about Sam... woohoo Which is stupid really as SAM is easy to plan gear for: 6hit + as much haste as you can + accuracy = TP build STR = WS build Lowering haste or accuracy for attack or any other stat (in TP) is counter-productive. At least there is something to debate in SCH bs BLM threads. Seipher said: best i can do with the time i have to play lol :p imma broke *** sam! xD as of right now i only swap my head/legs/feet/ring You WS in those hands? Pallas braclets are like 20-30k. |
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|