Random Politics & Religion #22

She's pretty standard for Playmate material. But given she's from New Jersey, she beat the bell curve at least.

She was a banger but "sadly is no longer a 10"

That has my child

Who rides a giant pussycat

Of Hard Knocks.

Casted Meteo (what do you mean, wrong game?)

I think she is still under that rock.

Since your being scientific I'd suggest using Lauren Pisciotta as your control group.

Oh, that explains why the proposed GOP healthcare plan was really a tax cut in disguise.

And you can honestly say that the tax cut benefits the rich only. For the first time in your life, this tax cut specifically targets the wealthy.

Because this tax specifically targets the wealthy.

A law designed to increase access to healthcare was found to increase access to healthcare.

No, the law was designed to make healthcare affordable.

It's in the god-damn name, for crying out loud. Do you remember it, or do you need somebody to hold your hand...again?

For ***'s sake. It was made with the intention of getting more people on insurance and making it affordable through regulation and subsidies was the mechanism through which it would happen. Pedantry isn't an argument.

When my insurance used to cost me 8k a year and now it costs me 8k plus a 2k deductible, you have effectively given me insurance that I will never use.

You get to call me covered but I still can't afford to goto the dr.

Thanks Obama.

Something about this girl:

It was made in hopes to make healthcare more affordable.

I mean, it's the first *** point in the DNC's propaganda releasing.

Let's check off what the DNC said it would do but didn't:

-It didn't give "Quality, affordable health care for all Americans"
-It didn't "Improving the quality and efficiency of health care" (it takes you weeks to see the doctor now, instead of a most a day prior)
-It didn't "Prevention of chronic disease and improving public health" (as evidenced here)
-It didn't create or improve "Transparency and program integrity"
-It didn't "Improving access to innovative medical therapies" (hell, anyone who pays attention to Medicaid, the biggest chunk of free Obamacare, would see that. How many people died while waiting for Medicaid treatments who would have been treated if Obamacare didn't place people who shouldn't be on Medicaid just last year? Wasn't it almost 70 people?)
-It didn't improve "Community living assistance services and supports" because those who would have been on Medicaid's rolls without Obamacare forcing them on it has received less services and support because of all the extra people on Medicaid.
-Most importantly, it didn't come close to it's stated "Revenue provisions" goal. Remember, Obamacare was "supposed" to have paid for itself due to the increased taxes. Which fell short, greatly.

Now we saw that the dems/liberals got everything wrong, we can also verify that what the Republicans stated when the law was signed would happen.....happened

Just admit it Pleebo, the law you support so strongly (because of feels and ducktape), it's a massive failure and is a major player in holding back this country from growing in prosperity. You are just too pigheaded to admit it.

I'm pretty sure he isn't responsible for it either....

clam down bro

Thiswas just repeating what your own link said. I didn't make any comment on the law's shortcomings. Seriously, calm the *** down.

So, you aren't refuting that the law not only failed to do any of the propaganda the DNC made when the law was released, it even failed to do anything that would signify it as a success after 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 times the goalposts were moved to classify this law as a success.

Why are you trying to hard to defend such a bad law? Is it because your lord and savior Obama helped create it?

Very Fake Discussions !

Has Fone posted/seen this yet?

I didn't defend anything just repeated the study. Kindly untrigger yourself.

Science is not partisan tons of anti Trump signs at march sure you keep telling yourself that !

And he promises to write the next law way better!

Ya know, Trump isn't really bound to classic Republican ideology at all. But he does want to be popular.

And really, the only way to save money on healthcare would be to go single payer or go heavily regulated, like Japan or Germany. Both of these models are anathema to classic Republican ideology. Both would grant Trump's campaign promise to cover everyone.

But the German style plan keeps the all important insurance lobby on board.

Team Trump could get a LOT of Democrats on board with a universal health insurance plan.

I'll send the message to Trump next time I see him at the golf course...

No they couldn't.

Bush tried appeasement for eight years and never made a single friend.

Until then I'll assume myself with Science dork anti trump signs:

There's no way he could *** anything up? His path in life is entirely predetermined?

i dont understand the first sign fone...

It's a dog with Trump's head about to take a huge dump on the rest of the world.

I guess Trump is a dog shitting on the Earth.

Standing on a post?