Fair enough.
Though I find it strange you sing the praises of Russia when in twenty years they've reached a point of Capitalist corruption that took the United States 200 years to reach.
Random Politics & Religion #00 |
||
Random Politics & Religion #00
Odin.Zicdeh said: » Like most people, Altimaomega is only concerned with what benefits him personally the most. Someone is gonna get dicked over in the system eventually, because power and resources are never distributed evenly or fairly. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Odin.Zicdeh said: » Conservatives like to *** about the big bad Gubbmint rigging the deck in favor of thier donors. Fair enough. Though I find it strange you sing the praises of Russia when in twenty years they've reached a point of Capitalist corruption that took the United States 200 years to reach. Bismarck.Bloodrose said: » Odin.Zicdeh said: » Like most people, Altimaomega is only concerned with what benefits him personally the most. Someone is gonna get dicked over in the system eventually, because power and resources are never distributed evenly or fairly. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Odin.Zicdeh said: » Conservatives like to *** about the big bad Gubbmint rigging the deck in favor of thier donors. Fair enough. Though I find it strange you sing the praises of Russia when in twenty years they've reached a point of Capitalist corruption that took the United States 200 years to reach. It all makes sense now. Odin.Zicdeh said: » Gonna have a hard time producing all that food when the Ogallala Aquifer dries up in the 2020's. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Obama - You didn't raise, feed, and milk those cows. He didn't personally take them away either. Be less stupid. Thanks for putting words in my mouth to vindicate a personal attack though. It just demostrates the personal bias everyone has on this current topic. Only the people actually working care about the system. Everyone else just likes to attack those they disagree with by disguising it with faulty implied logic. Stay classy FFXIAH. Cerberus.Pleebo said: » For two people who like to regularly criticize the reading comprehension of others, you both really have a knack for missing the point in such a fantastic manner. Odin.Jassik said: » So now you're changing your tune when faced with the obvious fascism it represents. Bravo, backpedaling like a boss. I figured that the "weed" portion of it would have shown you the sarcasm, but you two have your heads so firmly planted in each other's *** that neither could see what is obviously is in front of you. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Odin.Zicdeh said: » Gonna have a hard time producing all that food when the Ogallala Aquifer dries up in the 2020's. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Obama - You didn't raise, feed, and milk those cows. He didn't personally take them away either. Be less stupid. Thanks for putting words in my mouth to vindicate a personal attack though. It just demostrates the personal bias everyone has on this current topic. Only the people actually working care about the system. Everyone else just likes to attack those they disagree with by disguising it with faulty implied logic. Stay classy FFXIAH. What a coward, you don't even have the strength of a conviction. No wonder why you're a turncoat. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Odin.Zicdeh said: » Gonna have a hard time producing all that food when the Ogallala Aquifer dries up in the 2020's. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Obama - You didn't raise, feed, and milk those cows. He didn't personally take them away either. Be less stupid. Thanks for putting words in my mouth to vindicate a personal attack though. It just demostrates the personal bias everyone has on this current topic. Only the people actually working care about the system. Everyone else just likes to attack those they disagree with by disguising it with faulty implied logic. Stay classy FFXIAH. It's generally the liberals of this website that does it the most too, and then they think they are smart for doing that..... Asura.Kingnobody said: » Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Odin.Zicdeh said: » Gonna have a hard time producing all that food when the Ogallala Aquifer dries up in the 2020's. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Obama - You didn't raise, feed, and milk those cows. He didn't personally take them away either. Be less stupid. Thanks for putting words in my mouth to vindicate a personal attack though. It just demostrates the personal bias everyone has on this current topic. Only the people actually working care about the system. Everyone else just likes to attack those they disagree with by disguising it with faulty implied logic. Stay classy FFXIAH. It's generally the liberals of this website that does it the most too, and then they think they are smart for doing that..... It's not the reader's responsibility to decipher the writer's delusion. People can only respond to what you wrote. Don't write stupid ***if you don't want people to call it out. The argument made was that the US needs a system that's a blend of capitalism and socialism yet when Russia and China have already been running such a system, china still going a little slower, all you can do is criticize them and complain about thier success.
Russia was capitalistic a long time ago before economic conditions scared thier people into socialism. They've learned from thier history unlike the U.S. I don't expect many people here to know the history of the Far East though except omg communism and Stalin. Stalin wasn't even communist or Russian. Even wiki will tell you that. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » The argument made was that the US needs a system that's a blend of capitalism and socialism yet when Russia and China have already been running such a system, china still going a little slower, all you can do is criticize them and complain about thier success. Russia was capitalistic a long time ago before economic conditions scared thier people into socialism. They've learned from thier history unlike the U.S. I don't expect many people here to know the history of the Far East though except omg communism and Stalin. Stalin wasn't even communist or Russian. Even wiki will tell you that. Better dead than red. *** Communist scum. Asura.Kingnobody said: » Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Odin.Zicdeh said: » Gonna have a hard time producing all that food when the Ogallala Aquifer dries up in the 2020's. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Obama - You didn't raise, feed, and milk those cows. He didn't personally take them away either. Be less stupid. Thanks for putting words in my mouth to vindicate a personal attack though. It just demostrates the personal bias everyone has on this current topic. Only the people actually working care about the system. Everyone else just likes to attack those they disagree with by disguising it with faulty implied logic. Stay classy FFXIAH. It's generally the liberals of this website that does it the most too, and then they think they are smart for doing that..... It's a mob mentality really. Contradicts thier claim to empathy. All I'm saying is McCarthyism was a good idea. 3 John Wayne Movies a year and no rights for Blacks. And all the world asked was to be balanced on the razor's edge of nuclear Armageddon.
Altimaomega said: » And I said stop importing food from overseas and this problem would solve itself. Then you said "but I don't like corn". need I repeat myself over and over. or can you learn to read. Who do you think is importing food? Do you think the government is doing it? News flash, companies do it because it's PROFITABLE. So you're advocating stripping choice for producers and consumers in order to create a larger domestic demand for foodstuffs. Though, there's plenty of markets where the US cannot produce them at a competitive price, so you'd be using protectionist tariffs in order to offset the price difference, effectively imposing unfair restrictions on companies that depend on importing foodstuffs. I'm in favor of protectionist policies, but it sure isn't a very business friendly way to address the issue. Wouldn't the "conservative" line be to cut the farmers off the *** and let them figure out a way to make a profit, since that's the only way to get welfare people off their ***, right? Odin.Zicdeh said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Odin.Zicdeh said: » Gonna have a hard time producing all that food when the Ogallala Aquifer dries up in the 2020's. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Obama - You didn't raise, feed, and milk those cows. He didn't personally take them away either. Be less stupid. Thanks for putting words in my mouth to vindicate a personal attack though. It just demostrates the personal bias everyone has on this current topic. Only the people actually working care about the system. Everyone else just likes to attack those they disagree with by disguising it with faulty implied logic. Stay classy FFXIAH. It's generally the liberals of this website that does it the most too, and then they think they are smart for doing that..... It's not the reader's responsibility to decipher the writer's delusion. People can only respond to what you wrote. Don't write stupid ***if you don't want people to call it out. I could say the earth is round like a cookie and you would yell at me for making the argument that the earth is flat and call names for saying that, which I obviously said the earth is round. Asura.Kingnobody said: » I'm sorry that sarcasm is lost to the both of you. I figured that it was so blatantly obvious that even you two wouldn't need sarcasm tags to see that. I figured that the "weed" portion of it would have shown you the sarcasm, but you two have your heads so firmly planted in each other's *** that neither could see what is obviously is in front of you. Asura.Kingnobody said: » Odin.Zicdeh said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Odin.Zicdeh said: » Gonna have a hard time producing all that food when the Ogallala Aquifer dries up in the 2020's. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Obama - You didn't raise, feed, and milk those cows. He didn't personally take them away either. Be less stupid. Thanks for putting words in my mouth to vindicate a personal attack though. It just demostrates the personal bias everyone has on this current topic. Only the people actually working care about the system. Everyone else just likes to attack those they disagree with by disguising it with faulty implied logic. Stay classy FFXIAH. It's generally the liberals of this website that does it the most too, and then they think they are smart for doing that..... It's not the reader's responsibility to decipher the writer's delusion. People can only respond to what you wrote. Don't write stupid ***if you don't want people to call it out. I could say the earth is round and you would yell at me for making the argument that the earth is flat and call names for saying that, which I obviously said the earth is round. Well, I would agrue with you if you failed to present any evidence and reasons. Your typical debate format is: KN: <Say Something stupid.> NE1: <Points out that you said something stupid.> KN: <kwit puttni' werds in mouth pls stupid libtard.> <END OF LINE> Start explaining yourself more diligently, if you feel people missed your point, explain your point. Don't just handwave it and expect everyone to just assume you've delivered a sufficient rebuttal. If you don't feel it's worth the effort, get the *** over yourself then. Offline
Posts: 4394
Odin.Zicdeh said: » All I'm saying is McCarthyism was a good idea. 3 John Wayne Movies a year and no rights for Blacks. And all the world asked was to be balanced on the razor's edge of nuclear Armageddon. Its not cool to talk ***about John Wayne. Chuck Norris's only fear. Offline
Posts: 4394
Odin.Jassik said: » Altimaomega said: » And I said stop importing food from overseas and this problem would solve itself. Then you said "but I don't like corn". need I repeat myself over and over. or can you learn to read. Who do you think is importing food? Do you think the government is doing it? News flash, companies do it because it's PROFITABLE. So you're advocating stripping choice for producers and consumers in order to create a larger domestic demand for foodstuffs. Though, there's plenty of markets where the US cannot produce them at a competitive price, so you'd be using protectionist tariffs in order to offset the price difference, effectively imposing unfair restrictions on companies that depend on importing foodstuffs. I'm in favor of protectionist policies, but it sure isn't a very business friendly way to address the issue. Wouldn't the "conservative" line be to cut the farmers off the *** and let them figure out a way to make a profit, since that's the only way to get welfare people off their ***, right? The true Conservative line would be to do both. What you said in your first paragraph is exactly what I have been saying, only we wouldn't be "stripping choice for producers and consumers" we would be making a larger market the USA could fill. Offline
Posts: 4394
Asura.Kingnobody said: » Odin.Zicdeh said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Odin.Zicdeh said: » Gonna have a hard time producing all that food when the Ogallala Aquifer dries up in the 2020's. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Obama - You didn't raise, feed, and milk those cows. He didn't personally take them away either. Be less stupid. Thanks for putting words in my mouth to vindicate a personal attack though. It just demostrates the personal bias everyone has on this current topic. Only the people actually working care about the system. Everyone else just likes to attack those they disagree with by disguising it with faulty implied logic. Stay classy FFXIAH. It's generally the liberals of this website that does it the most too, and then they think they are smart for doing that..... It's not the reader's responsibility to decipher the writer's delusion. People can only respond to what you wrote. Don't write stupid ***if you don't want people to call it out. I could say the earth is round like a cookie and you would yell at me for making the argument that the earth is flat and call names for saying that, which I obviously said the earth is round. Perfect analogy of every one of these people we are always arguing with. Altimaomega said: » Odin.Jassik said: » Altimaomega said: » And I said stop importing food from overseas and this problem would solve itself. Then you said "but I don't like corn". need I repeat myself over and over. or can you learn to read. Who do you think is importing food? Do you think the government is doing it? News flash, companies do it because it's PROFITABLE. So you're advocating stripping choice for producers and consumers in order to create a larger domestic demand for foodstuffs. Though, there's plenty of markets where the US cannot produce them at a competitive price, so you'd be using protectionist tariffs in order to offset the price difference, effectively imposing unfair restrictions on companies that depend on importing foodstuffs. I'm in favor of protectionist policies, but it sure isn't a very business friendly way to address the issue. Wouldn't the "conservative" line be to cut the farmers off the *** and let them figure out a way to make a profit, since that's the only way to get welfare people off their ***, right? The true Conservative line would be to do both. What you said in your first paragraph is exactly what I have been saying, only we wouldn't be "stripping choice for producers and consumers" we would be making a larger market the USA could fill. By imposing restrictions on importing goods... Altimaomega said: » Odin.Zicdeh said: » All I'm saying is McCarthyism was a good idea. 3 John Wayne Movies a year and no rights for Blacks. And all the world asked was to be balanced on the razor's edge of nuclear Armageddon. Its not cool to talk ***about John Wayne. Chuck Norris's only fear. I wasn't really talking ***. John Wayne > Chuck Norris any day. But it was funny that he seemed to be the only actor working in those years. John Wayne.
Back when real men were comfortable wearing various colors of clothing most men today think is "sissy". One of his favorites was supposedly a shade of pink. Bismarck.Bloodrose said: » John Wayne. Back when real men were comfortable wearing various colors of clothing most men today think is "sissy". One of his favorites was supposedly a shade of pink. I think it's called "salmon". A nice manly name for pink. Might be the reason RUN AF is "salmon" colored to some people.
Offline
Posts: 4394
Bismarck.Bloodrose said: » John Wayne. Back when real men were comfortable wearing various colors of clothing most men today think is "sissy". One of his favorites was supposedly a shade of pink. Actually 100yrs ago about the time he would have been a child, pink was the color for boys and blue was the girls color. Offline
Posts: 4394
Odin.Jassik said: » Altimaomega said: » Odin.Jassik said: » Altimaomega said: » And I said stop importing food from overseas and this problem would solve itself. Then you said "but I don't like corn". need I repeat myself over and over. or can you learn to read. Who do you think is importing food? Do you think the government is doing it? News flash, companies do it because it's PROFITABLE. So you're advocating stripping choice for producers and consumers in order to create a larger domestic demand for foodstuffs. Though, there's plenty of markets where the US cannot produce them at a competitive price, so you'd be using protectionist tariffs in order to offset the price difference, effectively imposing unfair restrictions on companies that depend on importing foodstuffs. I'm in favor of protectionist policies, but it sure isn't a very business friendly way to address the issue. Wouldn't the "conservative" line be to cut the farmers off the *** and let them figure out a way to make a profit, since that's the only way to get welfare people off their ***, right? The true Conservative line would be to do both. What you said in your first paragraph is exactly what I have been saying, only we wouldn't be "stripping choice for producers and consumers" we would be making a larger market the USA could fill. By imposing restrictions on importing goods... Not restrictions, tax them and tax them hard. No reason overseas products should be cheaper than American made products. Altimaomega said: » Odin.Jassik said: » Altimaomega said: » Odin.Jassik said: » Altimaomega said: » And I said stop importing food from overseas and this problem would solve itself. Then you said "but I don't like corn". need I repeat myself over and over. or can you learn to read. Who do you think is importing food? Do you think the government is doing it? News flash, companies do it because it's PROFITABLE. So you're advocating stripping choice for producers and consumers in order to create a larger domestic demand for foodstuffs. Though, there's plenty of markets where the US cannot produce them at a competitive price, so you'd be using protectionist tariffs in order to offset the price difference, effectively imposing unfair restrictions on companies that depend on importing foodstuffs. I'm in favor of protectionist policies, but it sure isn't a very business friendly way to address the issue. Wouldn't the "conservative" line be to cut the farmers off the *** and let them figure out a way to make a profit, since that's the only way to get welfare people off their ***, right? The true Conservative line would be to do both. What you said in your first paragraph is exactly what I have been saying, only we wouldn't be "stripping choice for producers and consumers" we would be making a larger market the USA could fill. By imposing restrictions on importing goods... Not restrictions, tax them and tax them hard. No reason overseas products should be cheaper than American made products. Taxation is a restriction, bubba. That's what the 1% have been arguing for decades. Edit: would that also apply to companies that have moved their operations off-shore to evade income taxes? Because, I would be greatly in favor of that. Offline
Posts: 4394
Odin.Jassik said: » Altimaomega said: » Odin.Jassik said: » Altimaomega said: » Odin.Jassik said: » Altimaomega said: » And I said stop importing food from overseas and this problem would solve itself. Then you said "but I don't like corn". need I repeat myself over and over. or can you learn to read. Who do you think is importing food? Do you think the government is doing it? News flash, companies do it because it's PROFITABLE. So you're advocating stripping choice for producers and consumers in order to create a larger domestic demand for foodstuffs. Though, there's plenty of markets where the US cannot produce them at a competitive price, so you'd be using protectionist tariffs in order to offset the price difference, effectively imposing unfair restrictions on companies that depend on importing foodstuffs. I'm in favor of protectionist policies, but it sure isn't a very business friendly way to address the issue. Wouldn't the "conservative" line be to cut the farmers off the *** and let them figure out a way to make a profit, since that's the only way to get welfare people off their ***, right? The true Conservative line would be to do both. What you said in your first paragraph is exactly what I have been saying, only we wouldn't be "stripping choice for producers and consumers" we would be making a larger market the USA could fill. By imposing restrictions on importing goods... Not restrictions, tax them and tax them hard. No reason overseas products should be cheaper than American made products. Taxation is a restriction, bubba. That's what the 1% have been arguing for decades. And I'm such a huge fan of the 1% club. SARCASM Perhaps if you would stop lumping me into the 1% fan club, I'll stop calling you a dirty liberal. Edit for your edit: America needs to start looking out for Americans, screw the rest of the world. Altimaomega said: » Odin.Jassik said: » Altimaomega said: » Odin.Jassik said: » Altimaomega said: » Odin.Jassik said: » Altimaomega said: » And I said stop importing food from overseas and this problem would solve itself. Then you said "but I don't like corn". need I repeat myself over and over. or can you learn to read. Who do you think is importing food? Do you think the government is doing it? News flash, companies do it because it's PROFITABLE. So you're advocating stripping choice for producers and consumers in order to create a larger domestic demand for foodstuffs. Though, there's plenty of markets where the US cannot produce them at a competitive price, so you'd be using protectionist tariffs in order to offset the price difference, effectively imposing unfair restrictions on companies that depend on importing foodstuffs. I'm in favor of protectionist policies, but it sure isn't a very business friendly way to address the issue. Wouldn't the "conservative" line be to cut the farmers off the *** and let them figure out a way to make a profit, since that's the only way to get welfare people off their ***, right? The true Conservative line would be to do both. What you said in your first paragraph is exactly what I have been saying, only we wouldn't be "stripping choice for producers and consumers" we would be making a larger market the USA could fill. By imposing restrictions on importing goods... Not restrictions, tax them and tax them hard. No reason overseas products should be cheaper than American made products. Taxation is a restriction, bubba. That's what the 1% have been arguing for decades. And I'm such a huge fan of the 1% club. SARCASM Perhaps if you would stop lumping me into the 1% fan club, I'll stop calling you a dirty liberal. No dice, as long as you fanboy the teaparty, you're a 1% fanclub subscriber. Altimaomega said: » Not restrictions, tax them and tax them hard. No reason overseas products should be cheaper than American made products. Mmmm...You've never had to import anything from overseas, have you? So, because you have no connection to anything outside of the US, everyone else should suffer? Because it's not like there are any first or second generation Americans, right? What are those mythical unicorns? I have two large pieces of furniture in my house that are older than the United States (fun little tid-bit), and at the time, I had to have my parents help pay for freight and tariff fees for both sides of the pond, which came out to be $3,600. Not going to touch on estate tax for cross-borders inheritances, or as it was before 2009. |
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|