Interesting day watching the testimonies...
apparently favors are demands and it seems that Lt. Col Vindman is a potential leaker of information based on Rep Jim Jordan's questioning
New Impeachment Scam Thread. Nice People Only.
New impeachment scam thread. Nice people only.
Josiahafk said: »
the rule I am breaking gets a single post deleted or a single user a warning.
The "rules" I'm referring to would get the entire subforum deleted if we can't "play nice" wouldnt you say that's a bit more important and relevant?
I know without a doubt Roooks wouldnt delete a thread or a subforum just for my dumb posts and I didnt think it would offend anyone here, seeing as how it makes fun of both sides of the argument. I can gladly delete though just on principle for the vulgarity.
The "rules" I'm referring to would get the entire subforum deleted if we can't "play nice" wouldnt you say that's a bit more important and relevant?
I know without a doubt Roooks wouldnt delete a thread or a subforum just for my dumb posts and I didnt think it would offend anyone here, seeing as how it makes fun of both sides of the argument. I can gladly delete though just on principle for the vulgarity.
I don't care about the post, tempt your own fate if you so desire. Just don't be surprised when you get called out for your above-the-fray, holier-than-thou nonsense that's so conveniently directed only at people on the opposite political divide.
[+]
volkom said: »
Interesting day watching the testimonies...
apparently favors are demands and it seems that Lt. Col Vindman is a potential leaker of information based on Rep Jim Jordan's questioning
apparently favors are demands and it seems that Lt. Col Vindman is a potential leaker of information based on Rep Jim Jordan's questioning
Yeah, and the Vindman/Schiff exchange was really odd. Both of them testified that they don't know the identity of the whistleblower but Schiff feels the need to be interject so that Vindman doesn't reveal his/her identity? That's sketchy at best.
[+]
Caitsith.Shiroi said: »
Nausi said: »
Vindman is falling apart in this thing.
Claims to never have met the whistleblower yet schiff has to step in to make sure he doesn’t name them (because schiff knows who it is despite lying and claiming otherwise)
Claims to never have met the whistleblower yet schiff has to step in to make sure he doesn’t name them (because schiff knows who it is despite lying and claiming otherwise)
This is a really dumb argument and I'm "almost" surprised people are blind enough to believe that crap.
He may know the person who is the whistleblower without actually knowing the fact this person is the whistleblower.
Vindman admitted he spoke to someone about the call who is outside his chain of command. That's who he's talking about.
Schiff is never going to admit it. So if that's what you're waiting for, god bless you.
[+]
Bismarck.Josiahflaming said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
(even when it's satire from an evil conservative)
Don't you think that being spammed daily kinda flies exactly into the face of the above request Roooks made? We don't need to fill this site with straw man fallacies regarding anyone we disagree with to be satirical.
My post didn't even fit the definition of a straw-man. I went ridiculously satirical on purpose so that there would be no confusion, mainly due to the fact that a certain few people in here who don't understand subtlety in the slightest. Now can we get back to the discussion at hand, or are you going to spend all your time taking everyone (read: conservatives) to task about not being on topic instead of, you know, contributing to the topic?
[+]
So you are policing this thread to see if people use straw man arguments ?
Is that some sort of fetish ?
Is that some sort of fetish ?
[+]
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Josiahafk said: »
the rule I am breaking gets a single post deleted or a single user a warning.
The "rules" I'm referring to would get the entire subforum deleted if we can't "play nice" wouldnt you say that's a bit more important and relevant?
I know without a doubt Roooks wouldnt delete a thread or a subforum just for my dumb posts and I didnt think it would offend anyone here, seeing as how it makes fun of both sides of the argument. I can gladly delete though just on principle for the vulgarity.
The "rules" I'm referring to would get the entire subforum deleted if we can't "play nice" wouldnt you say that's a bit more important and relevant?
I know without a doubt Roooks wouldnt delete a thread or a subforum just for my dumb posts and I didnt think it would offend anyone here, seeing as how it makes fun of both sides of the argument. I can gladly delete though just on principle for the vulgarity.
I don't care about the post, tempt your own fate if you so desire. Just don't be surprised when you get called out for your above-the-fray, holier-than-thou nonsense that's so conveniently directed only at people on the opposite political divide.
Donny is not holy and certainly not about the fray... he is here with us sub humans.
above the fray *
Josiahafk said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Josiahafk said: »
the rule I am breaking gets a single post deleted or a single user a warning.
The "rules" I'm referring to would get the entire subforum deleted if we can't "play nice" wouldnt you say that's a bit more important and relevant?
I know without a doubt Roooks wouldnt delete a thread or a subforum just for my dumb posts and I didnt think it would offend anyone here, seeing as how it makes fun of both sides of the argument. I can gladly delete though just on principle for the vulgarity.
The "rules" I'm referring to would get the entire subforum deleted if we can't "play nice" wouldnt you say that's a bit more important and relevant?
I know without a doubt Roooks wouldnt delete a thread or a subforum just for my dumb posts and I didnt think it would offend anyone here, seeing as how it makes fun of both sides of the argument. I can gladly delete though just on principle for the vulgarity.
I don't care about the post, tempt your own fate if you so desire. Just don't be surprised when you get called out for your above-the-fray, holier-than-thou nonsense that's so conveniently directed only at people on the opposite political divide.
There is no equivocation here, only semantics. Don't forget we have the same goal; To keep this subforum warranted as viable and sustainable.
Thank you Donny for attempting to make a point. I'm not sure this forum could survive without your diligence.
[+]
volkom said: »
Interesting day watching the testimonies...
apparently favors are demands and it seems that Lt. Col Vindman is a potential leaker of information based on Rep Jim Jordan's questioning
apparently favors are demands and it seems that Lt. Col Vindman is a potential leaker of information based on Rep Jim Jordan's questioning
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
Bismarck.Josiahflaming said: »
Bahamut.Ravael said: »
(even when it's satire from an evil conservative)
Don't you think that being spammed daily kinda flies exactly into the face of the above request Roooks made? We don't need to fill this site with straw man fallacies regarding anyone we disagree with to be satirical.
My post didn't even fit the definition of a straw-man. I went ridiculously satirical on purpose so that there would be no confusion, mainly due to the fact that a certain few people in here who don't understand subtlety in the slightest. Now can we get back to the discussion at hand, or are you going to spend all your time taking everyone (read: conservatives) to task about not being on topic instead of, you know, contributing to the topic?
Must be a Canadian things to make problems out of nothing. I'm pretty sure we could go 100 pages without someone say. "Hey man that's a straw man argument. I deduct 30 internet points from your post" !
Maybe every time we use a straw man argument we can have a Canadian flag appear.
[+]
Well, they're running out of time one way or another to make their case to the American public. These hearings have been a joke.
[+]
Instead of talking about politics you are arguing about how we should argue ?
That helps how ?
That helps how ?
[+]
Having a real debate on the internet....you might as well get a mirror and argue with yourself. No one here takes this ***seriously. Look at the other sections it is filled with anime and and stupid memes. I'd say the average mentality of this forum is about 12 years old.
And no just because you are arguing with another poster doesn't make it a good argument.
And no just because you are arguing with another poster doesn't make it a good argument.
[+]
The only reason we have this thread is probably to keep our dumb *** from shitting up other threads. And we don't really bother anyone. It's like our own island of misfit toys.
[+]
Bismarck.Josiahflaming said: »
fonewear said: »
So you are policing this thread to see if people use straw man arguments ?
Is that some sort of fetish ?
Is that some sort of fetish ?
you may not have noticed fone but many of our posters that oppose the four of you eventually gave up with trying to have genuine dialogue here. I wouldn't be surprised if more than ~70% of the last 1000 pages in P & R has been straw man dialogue attempting provocation or encouraging it, until all attempts at dialogue are given up and we stop seeing the posters.
Viscious must be a masochist at this point for staying here as long as he does.
Oh yes. Vic is so much better. That's why half of his posts are him taking shots at Nausi. What a fantastic judge of good posting you are.
[+]
Let me know when the genuine dialogue starts by the way. I don't want to miss it.
[+]
Also this is a lot of reading for a Tuesday. Maybe you can give me extra credit for reading on a weekday.
I can even post phony links claiming I researched some ***to make it look official.
I can even post phony links claiming I researched some ***to make it look official.
[+]
I can discuss politics...but arguing about arguing sounds intriguing...
I'm pretty sure he'd still be wrong with or without a "pack mentality" around
[+]
In the future my name must be spelled correctly. I would hate to be confused with that other guy on Shiva that TPs in WS gear.
[+]
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2026 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.