Full Potato Thread!!! |
||
Full Potato Thread!!!
Offline
Posts: 516
I wasn't stating hard emo evidence circumstanced information though , more of a 'lets talk' about a political person's latest ideology
Potato Jesus was crisscut and and tossed in a skillet for your sins repent I say unto you or face the deep-fried tuberlations that await you!
Bloodrose said: » KN, I think you need to make the text bigger, and more potato. Asura.Kingnobody said: » Kooljack said: » an OP sourcing a political talk show host, to see what people's comments are with said person's latest ideas is locked because. 'OP's fault'. And now we have this thread, wtfBBQmuffins how does that make sense? Anna Ruthven said: » Bloodrose said: » He, like Lordgrim, know full well about the Random PnR thread, however refuse to use it for, ya know, random politics and religion articles. Though, that would first require using actual articles, instead of made up ***. As for Lordgrim, I'm not one to disrupt a presidential campaign. Verda said: » Yes, sort of along the lines of, "you didn't have to be a jerk, but you were." "Didn't have to" is sort of ambiguous wording. I mean, you don't have to ride the roller coasters or play the games if you go to an amusement park. But it's really not nearly as fun if you don't. Put a potato in yer mouths all of you!
Valefor.Sehachan said: » Put a potato in yer mouths all of you! Offline
Posts: 516
so we can't have bill maher, or mark levin dedicated threads without linking their website or someting?
Hmm gotta conjure up some apostles and such for Potato Jesus
Kooljack said: » so we can't have bill maher, or mark levin dedicated threads without linking their website or someting? But you can't make unsubstantiated threads. At least provide a source for your ramblings in the first post. Kooljack said: » so we can't have bill maher, or mark levin dedicated threads without linking their website or someting? Offline
Posts: 516
was my op entirely opinionated from my own creative thinking?
I cited a person. a famous current person. I cited business economic health between present and 6 years ago all i ever wanted was discussion on two political media personnel's ideology Kooljack said: » so we can't have bill maher, or mark levin dedicated threads without linking their website or someting? Cerberus.Anjisnu said: » Hmm gotta conjure up some apostles and such for Potato Jesus TATER TOTS Offline
Posts: 13787
Making a claim that someone said something, or happened to them without proof, is nothing short of name-dropping and/or possible grounds for libel/slander.
It isn't even about the "hard emo evidence", it's simply part of posturing a debate. Had you posted and articulated as an idea, it would have been relevant, and thus open to discussion, where as a random "quote" without an article or any kind of background, deletes any kind of context available to begin an informed discussion of where an ideology like that would come from, and the possible reasons a person would say it. Verda said: » Having fun at others expense isn't exactly a morally sound argument tho, is it? Man feels like a frat house in here. Bonding through mutually reciprocated insults is a time-honored tradition. Just because it's done in fraternities doesn't mean others can't do it too. Offline
Posts: 13787
Kooljack said: » was my op entirely opinionated from my own creative thinking? I cited a person. a famous current person. I cited business economic health between present and 6 years ago You made a claim that a person said something. You made a claim that business economic health was one thing, when data shows otherwise, without any kind of proof. That is not citing anything. That, is being potato. I grew up in Shelley and potatoes are kind of a big thing there. There is even a town holiday for potatoes. Here is a link to the holiday. Spud Day Offline
Posts: 516
It's more about the general concepts of which these people are grounded.
Actually this potato has substance.
OP linked potato roots to religion and politics. But if this potato has no roots in P&R, feel free to uproot potato and replant in a better grounded place... Also, potato. Offline
Posts: 13787
Valefor.Endoq said: » Actually this potato has substance. OP linked potato roots to religion and politics. But if this potato has no roots in P&R, feel free to uproot potato and replant in a better grounded place... Also, potato. MAY ALL EMBRACE THE POTATO PRAYER! Offline
Posts: 13787
Kooljack said: » It's more about the general concepts of which these people are grounded. It's not necessarily a bad thing. Anyways, when "citing" a person or data, it's best to actually link that information for a person to pore over and make come to a conclusion themselves, unless you want to replicate that concept in your own words. In that case, it would have substance, and probably have been fine. Kooljack said: » was my op entirely opinionated from my own creative thinking? Kooljack said: » I cited a person. a famous current person. If an individual has to look up who that person is, that's generally a sign that they aren't well known. Kooljack said: » I cited business economic health between present and 6 years ago But since I'm feeling helpful today, I will show you the difference between a statement and a citation. A statement is something that an individual (in this case, you) stated. Here is an example: IRC §179 limitation is $500,000 and $2,000,000 for 2014. This is a true statement. However, you have no idea what I am talking about, nor did I provide evidence that this is true. I know this is true because this is part of my line of work. However, you don't know it is true or false. A citation is a statement backed by a primary source as evidence. Using my example from above: IRC §179 limitation is $500,000 and $2,000,000 for 2014. or IRC §179 limitation is $500,000 and $2,000,000 for 2014. or IRC §179 limitation is $500,000 and $2,000,000 for 2014. I have cited 3 different sources using the same statement. That is the difference between a statement and citation. Statements are not allowed for P&R thread creation, cited sources are needed. Quit being a sandy potato. Endoq lordgrim this non believers ***!
Offline
Posts: 516
Bloodrose said: » You made a claim that business economic health was one thing, when data shows otherwise, without any kind of proof. That is not citing anything. That, is being potato. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-01-14/gallup-ceo-blasts-us-leadership-economy-not-coming-back "The U.S. now ranks not first, not second, not third, but 12th among developed nations in terms of business startup activity. Countries such as Hungary, Denmark, Finland, New Zealand, Sweden, Israel and Italy all have higher startup rates than America does. We are behind in starting new firms per capita, and this is our single most serious economic problem. Yet it seems like a secret. You never see it mentioned in the media, nor hear from a politician that, for the first time in 35 years, American business deaths now outnumber business births. The U.S. Census Bureau reports that the total number of new business startups and business closures per year -- the birth and death rates of American companies -- have crossed for the first time since the measurement began. I am referring to employer businesses, those with one or more employees, the real engines of economic growth. Four hundred thousand new businesses are being born annually nationwide, while 470,000 per year are dying." |
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|