Cerberus.Anjisnu said: »
Doesn't matter Obama is not the hope and changed you wanted
Obama Threatens To Veto Now That Congress Works |
||
|
Obama threatens to veto now that Congress works
fonewear said: » JFK is my favorite President/airport ! If I were the leader of Kenya I'd rename Nairobi's airport Barack Obama International just for shits. fonewear said: » If it wasn't for JFK I wouldn't be a guilty white man ! Cheating on your wife does that. If Grover Cleveland was still around things would be different and by different I mean Mugwumps.
Siren.Mosin said: » I'm pretty sure obama has used the veto less than any other president, at this point, barring guys that were shot too early to do anything. It could be argued that's because the Senate Majority leader wouldn't allow a bill to hit the Presidents desk that he would be inclined to Veto. Now that the Senate and House are majority Republican there is a possibility that bills will make it to his desk that isn't in line with the Dem's agenda. This puts him in a bad position, if he starts vetoing then his opponents will use that on his successor. If he doesn't veto then it will be seen as a win for the Republican party and they will use that on the next election. He's in a situation where his only winning move is to have the remaining Democrat senators try their best to make sure nothing gets through and then during the next election blame the Republicans for it. The Democrat party needs to realize that they are unpopular right now, too much zealotry in pushing a progressive agenda on people who didn't want it. Tone it down and focus on a middle ground approach, appear to be the party of compromise and make the Republicans be the bad guys. Worst case scenario is that you actually get something done, legislation passed that isn't dramatically tilted one way or the other. Of course that will royally piss off the extremists, of which there are many present here. Lakshmi.Saevel said: » It could be argued that's because the Senate Majority leader wouldn't allow a bill to hit the Presidents desk that he would be inclined to Veto. a fair point. *fires my AK-47 into the air*
Zealot, reporting for duty. fonewear said: » If Grover Cleveland was still around things would be different and by different I mean Mugwumps. No one remembers the venerable Warren Harding. Collapsing and dying in the middle of a conversation with your wife just doesn't have the same ring as getting shot in a theater or getting sniped in a motorcade. Lakshmi.Saevel said: » Siren.Mosin said: » I'm pretty sure obama has used the veto less than any other president, at this point, barring guys that were shot too early to do anything. It could be argued that's because the Senate Majority leader wouldn't allow a bill to hit the Presidents desk that he would be inclined to Veto. Now that the Senate and House are majority Republican there is a possibility that bills will make it to his desk that isn't in line with the Dem's agenda. This puts him in a bad position, if he starts vetoing then his opponents will use that on his successor. If he doesn't veto then it will be seen as a win for the Republican party and they will use that on the next election. He's in a situation where his only winning move is to have the remaining Democrat senators try their best to make sure nothing gets through and then during the next election blame the Republicans for it. The Democrat party needs to realize that they are unpopular right now, too much zealotry in pushing a progressive agenda on people who didn't want it. Tone it down and focus on a middle ground approach, appear to be the party of compromise and make the Republicans be the bad guys. Worst case scenario is that you actually get something done, legislation passed that isn't dramatically tilted one way or the other. Of course that will royally piss off the extremists, of which there are many present here. That door swings both ways, though. There has been a literal flood of terrible bills coming from the house for several years, stuff that had no chance of getting through a floor vote, much less getting signed into law. If the parties were reversed, I'd still call it the same way, too. It's a large group letting a small subset of extremists push through terrible legislation because they know it won't get anywhere and they can use it as a campaign ad in the next election. Reid is a pretty pathetic leader, but I can't fault him for not wasting limited floor time on things that have no hope of making it through. It's not like the same thing didn't happen with tons of bills the other direction, either, and a lot of them were good. Remember the 9/11 first responder's bill that almost died on Boehner's desk while they were wasting their time trying to keep even more people from getting medical care? Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: » fonewear said: » If Grover Cleveland was still around things would be different and by different I mean Mugwumps. No one remembers the venerable Warren Harding. Collapsing and dying in the middle of a conversation with your wife just doesn't have the same ring as getting shot in a theater or getting sniped in a motorcade. What about William Henry Harrison, caught a cold at his inauguration and died 31 days later. threatening to veto stuff before it even reaches anything seems nothing more then a 'us vs them' party mentality.
He mentions 'defending gains made' but the examples given seem to only be things that he played a part in. Which leads be back to thinking its more about him and his party as opposed to whats best for the country. And while the veto process has its place, it seems like the manor in which he is 'threatening' to use it, is all about him and what he wants. - Politicians (all) are not (should not) elected to do what they think should be done (in its entirety). They are elected to carry out the will of the ppl. - Somewhere along the lines it got reversed tho to where ppl seem to be electing them based on what the politician personally wants/believes and not the ppl. Odin.Jassik said: » Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: » fonewear said: » If Grover Cleveland was still around things would be different and by different I mean Mugwumps. No one remembers the venerable Warren Harding. Collapsing and dying in the middle of a conversation with your wife just doesn't have the same ring as getting shot in a theater or getting sniped in a motorcade. What about William Henry Harrison, caught a cold at his inauguration and died 31 days later. A bottle of Nyquil Severe would have fixed him right up and what do the idiot doctors do? Give him opium. /facepalm. Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: » Odin.Jassik said: » Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: » fonewear said: » If Grover Cleveland was still around things would be different and by different I mean Mugwumps. No one remembers the venerable Warren Harding. Collapsing and dying in the middle of a conversation with your wife just doesn't have the same ring as getting shot in a theater or getting sniped in a motorcade. What about William Henry Harrison, caught a cold at his inauguration and died 31 days later. A bottle of Nyquil Severe would have fixed him right up and what do the idiot doctors do? Give him opium. /facepalm. If it were a legitimate cold, his body would have just shut the whole thing down. Odin.Jassik said: » Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: » Odin.Jassik said: » Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: » fonewear said: » If Grover Cleveland was still around things would be different and by different I mean Mugwumps. No one remembers the venerable Warren Harding. Collapsing and dying in the middle of a conversation with your wife just doesn't have the same ring as getting shot in a theater or getting sniped in a motorcade. What about William Henry Harrison, caught a cold at his inauguration and died 31 days later. A bottle of Nyquil Severe would have fixed him right up and what do the idiot doctors do? Give him opium. /facepalm. If it were a legitimate cold, his body would have just shut the whole thing down. His body wasn't ready. In good news, Harrisons grandson got to be president and save the family legacy by being an overall mediocre leader.
Get told at dinner enough times grandpa was the only president to clock out after 30 days and you'd be surprised how motivated the youth get. Problem is the Republicans really could care less about doing what is right for the people. They are only interested in pushing their own special inteest. That is often based on lining their own pocket and pushing their finacial backers agendas. This while setting themselfs up for cushy jobs after they are out of office. Also the fact they say everything is wrong that any other group puts forward no matter what it is.
Now the Dem I have no clue what the hell they are doing. They seem to afraid to truly push their agendas and stand up for things. Also I'm no tsure what exactly do towards their special interest groups since they just are not as vocal or obvious about it as the Reps. It just comes down to neiter group are doing their jobs and trying to do what is right for the people. Heimdel said: » Problem is the Politicians really could care less about doing what is right for the people. They are only interested in pushing their own special inteest. That is often based on lining their own pocket and pushing their finacial backers agendas. This while setting themselfs up for cushy jobs after they are out of office. Also the fact they say everything is wrong that any other group puts forward no matter what it is. fixed I'm neither supporter nor critic of obama im a critic of the sham that is presidency in general last one that tried to go against his owners was sitting in the front seat, street, and his wife's lap in his final moments lol Odin.Godofgods said: » threatening to veto stuff before it even reaches anything seems nothing more then a 'us vs them' party mentality. Asura.Kingnobody said: » Odin.Godofgods said: » threatening to veto stuff before it even reaches anything seems nothing more then a 'us vs them' party mentality. Googled your phrase and nothing remotely close came up pertaining to Obama, care to source? Lakshmi.Eyrhika said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Odin.Godofgods said: » threatening to veto stuff before it even reaches anything seems nothing more then a 'us vs them' party mentality. Googled your phrase and nothing remotely close came up pertaining to Obama, care to source? Nobody, King. Talking with my Anus. ***: *** Ltd., 2014.. Asura.Kingnobody said: » Odin.Godofgods said: » threatening to veto stuff before it even reaches anything seems nothing more then a 'us vs them' party mentality. I love how you constantly talk about what he thinks but can't support it with any evidence based on what he's said publicly or privately. Then, the next fallback is "his policies!", again, without being able to demonstrate anything. There is so much to skewer Obama on that is REAL and you choose to churn up diarrhea instead.
Bruh. Lakshmi.Eyrhika said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Odin.Godofgods said: » threatening to veto stuff before it even reaches anything seems nothing more then a 'us vs them' party mentality. Googled your phrase and nothing remotely close came up pertaining to Obama, care to source? Somewhat relevant despite the source. But this is what I am talking about Quote: When asked if the U.S. is more racially divided than it was when he took office six years ago, the President responded: "No, I actually think that it's probably in its day-to-day interactions less racially divided." Oh look, people talking out of their *** again.
Couldn't even wait for a response, could ya Sparth and Jassik. Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: » There is so much to skewer Obama on that is REAL Also, I'm unlikely to check this thread again for a week, so the people who willingly pay attention to a network that has been fact-checked with a shocking 18% accuracy rate can dribble whatever they like about how deluded I am, but I'll be paying as much attention to that as you all do to verifiable and accurate data. Asura.Kingnobody said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » And yet, Obama thinks that he is the "greatest unifier in modern history" Quote: When asked if the U.S. is more racially divided than it was when he took office six years ago, the President responded: "No, I actually think that it's probably in its day-to-day interactions less racially divided." Clearly, these two remarks are identical... Asura.Kingnobody said: » Oh look, people talking out of their *** again. Yup... it's you. Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: » There is so much to skewer Obama on that is REAL and you choose to churn up diarrhea instead. Bruh. When shown real issues with Obama and his administration, you rather cry "racist" or "not a real issue" Odin.Jassik said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » And yet, Obama thinks that he is the "greatest unifier in modern history" Quote: When asked if the U.S. is more racially divided than it was when he took office six years ago, the President responded: "No, I actually think that it's probably in its day-to-day interactions less racially divided." Clearly, these two remarks are identical... Asura.Kingnobody said: » Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: » There is so much to skewer Obama on that is REAL and you choose to churn up diarrhea instead. Bruh. When shown real issues with Obama and his administration, you rather cry "racist" Was that Solyndra or Benghazi, I can't remember which... |
||
|
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2025 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|
||