fonewear said: »
Hey global warming is real and scary. I'm hiding under a table as I'm writing this.
Bring a fan. Air might get hot and stuffy down there.
Random Politics & Religion #00
Random Politics & Religion #00
Bring a fan. Air might get hot and stuffy down there.
[+]
The first step is to ban the word bossy. The next step is become the boss. Then claim that banning a word is not bossy !
Shiva.Nikolce said: »
Bismarck.Ramyrez said: »
Altimaomega said: »
cold winter
cold summer
Old Farmers Almanac calling for early and cold winter.
The person currently residing in the White House decides this is a good idea.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/27/us/politics/obama-pursuing-climate-accord-in-lieu-of-treaty.html?_r=0
cold summer
Old Farmers Almanac calling for early and cold winter.
The person currently residing in the White House decides this is a good idea.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/27/us/politics/obama-pursuing-climate-accord-in-lieu-of-treaty.html?_r=0
Altima, will you please show us on the doll where the climate change lobbyist touched you?
Seriously. If your anti-climate-change anger were rated on a Viagra scale of "how long this errection has lasted", you'd be at 5+ hours and should be contacting a doctor.
Like, at this point, I don't care if the planet melts or freezes, I just want you to find a new obsession to post about in all threads regardless of topic.
This isn't just about global warming, its about getting around congress yet again. But everyone else is just like you, they don't seem to care or worse actually support this.
Altimaomega said: »
Bismarck.Ramyrez said: »
Altimaomega said: »
cold winter
cold summer
Old Farmers Almanac calling for early and cold winter.
The person currently residing in the White House decides this is a good idea.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/27/us/politics/obama-pursuing-climate-accord-in-lieu-of-treaty.html?_r=0
cold summer
Old Farmers Almanac calling for early and cold winter.
The person currently residing in the White House decides this is a good idea.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/27/us/politics/obama-pursuing-climate-accord-in-lieu-of-treaty.html?_r=0
Altima, will you please show us on the doll where the climate change lobbyist touched you?
Seriously. If your anti-climate-change anger were rated on a Viagra scale of "how long this errection has lasted", you'd be at 5+ hours and should be contacting a doctor.
Like, at this point, I don't care if the planet melts or freezes, I just want you to find a new obsession to post about in all threads regardless of topic.
This isn't just about global warming, its about getting around congress yet again. But everyone else is just like you, they don't seem to care or worse actually support this.
No, you misunderstand me.
I'm just tired of you injecting the topic into everything else.
I care. And I actually support this.
Because here's the thing, and I'll say it again. Reduction of Greenhouse Gasses -- even if climate change is COMPLETE CRAP -- is STILL BENEFICIAL to us as a people.
So...sod off, Altima. Seriously. Go find some right-wing nutjub forum where you can all circle jerk about how terrible Obama is, and how climate change is a liberal hoax, and whatever other crackpot ***that turns you on in lieu of women.
[+]
Bismarck.Ramyrez said: »
Altimaomega said: »
Bismarck.Ramyrez said: »
Altimaomega said: »
cold winter
cold summer
Old Farmers Almanac calling for early and cold winter.
The person currently residing in the White House decides this is a good idea.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/27/us/politics/obama-pursuing-climate-accord-in-lieu-of-treaty.html?_r=0
cold summer
Old Farmers Almanac calling for early and cold winter.
The person currently residing in the White House decides this is a good idea.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/27/us/politics/obama-pursuing-climate-accord-in-lieu-of-treaty.html?_r=0
Altima, will you please show us on the doll where the climate change lobbyist touched you?
Seriously. If your anti-climate-change anger were rated on a Viagra scale of "how long this errection has lasted", you'd be at 5+ hours and should be contacting a doctor.
Like, at this point, I don't care if the planet melts or freezes, I just want you to find a new obsession to post about in all threads regardless of topic.
This isn't just about global warming, its about getting around congress yet again. But everyone else is just like you, they don't seem to care or worse actually support this.
No, you misunderstand me.
I care.
I'm just tired of you injecting the topic into everything else.
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bismarck.Ramyrez said: »
Altimaomega said: »
Bismarck.Ramyrez said: »
Altimaomega said: »
cold winter
cold summer
Old Farmers Almanac calling for early and cold winter.
The person currently residing in the White House decides this is a good idea.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/27/us/politics/obama-pursuing-climate-accord-in-lieu-of-treaty.html?_r=0
cold summer
Old Farmers Almanac calling for early and cold winter.
The person currently residing in the White House decides this is a good idea.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/27/us/politics/obama-pursuing-climate-accord-in-lieu-of-treaty.html?_r=0
Altima, will you please show us on the doll where the climate change lobbyist touched you?
Seriously. If your anti-climate-change anger were rated on a Viagra scale of "how long this errection has lasted", you'd be at 5+ hours and should be contacting a doctor.
Like, at this point, I don't care if the planet melts or freezes, I just want you to find a new obsession to post about in all threads regardless of topic.
This isn't just about global warming, its about getting around congress yet again. But everyone else is just like you, they don't seem to care or worse actually support this.
No, you misunderstand me.
I care.
I'm just tired of you injecting the topic into everything else.
Yeah, yeah. I know. Just...it's like 90% of what he talks about.
He's like Bizzaro Al Gore.
Bismarck.Ramyrez said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bismarck.Ramyrez said: »
Altimaomega said: »
Bismarck.Ramyrez said: »
Altimaomega said: »
cold winter
cold summer
Old Farmers Almanac calling for early and cold winter.
The person currently residing in the White House decides this is a good idea.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/27/us/politics/obama-pursuing-climate-accord-in-lieu-of-treaty.html?_r=0
cold summer
Old Farmers Almanac calling for early and cold winter.
The person currently residing in the White House decides this is a good idea.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/27/us/politics/obama-pursuing-climate-accord-in-lieu-of-treaty.html?_r=0
Altima, will you please show us on the doll where the climate change lobbyist touched you?
Seriously. If your anti-climate-change anger were rated on a Viagra scale of "how long this errection has lasted", you'd be at 5+ hours and should be contacting a doctor.
Like, at this point, I don't care if the planet melts or freezes, I just want you to find a new obsession to post about in all threads regardless of topic.
This isn't just about global warming, its about getting around congress yet again. But everyone else is just like you, they don't seem to care or worse actually support this.
No, you misunderstand me.
I care.
I'm just tired of you injecting the topic into everything else.
Yeah, yeah. I know. Just...it's like 90% of what he talks about.
He's like Bizzaro Al Gore.
Problem is, I remember a Robot Chicken episode of Bizarro Wonder Women. Unfortunately, I would get fired just to watch it....
Speaking of Obama:
[+]
Bismarck.Ramyrez said: »
Altimaomega said: »
Bismarck.Ramyrez said: »
Altimaomega said: »
cold winter
cold summer
Old Farmers Almanac calling for early and cold winter.
The person currently residing in the White House decides this is a good idea.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/27/us/politics/obama-pursuing-climate-accord-in-lieu-of-treaty.html?_r=0
cold summer
Old Farmers Almanac calling for early and cold winter.
The person currently residing in the White House decides this is a good idea.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/27/us/politics/obama-pursuing-climate-accord-in-lieu-of-treaty.html?_r=0
Altima, will you please show us on the doll where the climate change lobbyist touched you?
Seriously. If your anti-climate-change anger were rated on a Viagra scale of "how long this errection has lasted", you'd be at 5+ hours and should be contacting a doctor.
Like, at this point, I don't care if the planet melts or freezes, I just want you to find a new obsession to post about in all threads regardless of topic.
This isn't just about global warming, its about getting around congress yet again. But everyone else is just like you, they don't seem to care or worse actually support this.
No, you misunderstand me.
I'm just tired of you injecting the topic into everything else.
I care. And I actually support this.
Because here's the thing, and I'll say it again. Reduction of Greenhouse Gasses -- even if climate change is COMPLETE CRAP -- is STILL BENEFICIAL to us as a people.
So...sod off, Altima. Seriously. Go find some right-wing nutjub forum where you can all circle jerk about how terrible Obama is, and how climate change is a liberal hoax, and whatever other crackpot ***that turns you on in lieu of women.
Right wing nut job forums are really boring. This forum has people like you that blow a gasket when someone challenges your thought process's. Also, if "climate change" is COMPLETE CRAP. Why do you feel the need to burden everyone with less jobs and more expensive power?
p.s. Climate change isn't complete crap its been going on for billions of years. Global Warming on the other hand is COMPLETE crap.
[+]
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Well, it is Random P&R thread, so it's not like he is breaking the rules in this case....
The thread is now "Bust Chaosx's balls for littering!!"
because he is filthy littering sumbish
[+]
Altimaomega said: »
Also, if "climate change" is COMPLETE CRAP. Why do you feel the need to burden everyone with less jobs and more expensive power?
Why, exactly, can't green they find work in green technologies? I still can't wrap my head around why apparently a bio-reactor or nuclear power plant requires less workers than a coal plant, for example.
[+]
Probably because newer plants = more efficiency, (in theory).
edit: but that would be negated by you know: not killing us all off in a few hundred years.
edit: but that would be negated by you know: not killing us all off in a few hundred years.
[+]
Quote:
Right wing nut job forums are really boring. This forum has people like you that blow a gasket when someone challenges your thought process's. Also, if "climate change" is COMPLETE CRAP. Why do you feel the need to burden everyone with less jobs and more expensive power?
p.s. Climate change isn't complete crap its been going on for billions of years. Global Warming on the other hand is COMPLETE crap.
p.s. Climate change isn't complete crap its been going on for billions of years. Global Warming on the other hand is COMPLETE crap.
I'm not blowing a gasket because you're challenging my thought processes. I'm not sure you have it in you to do that deliberately.
You may do it inadvertently, however, by making me question how our country can survive the next few generations with people like you out there breeding.
Jetackuu said: »
Probably because newer plants = more efficiency, (in theory).
edit: but that would be negated by you know: not killing us all off in a few hundred years.
edit: but that would be negated by you know: not killing us all off in a few hundred years.
I still find it funny that most of those with the political belief that destroying the environment is okay are the same people with the political beliefs that abortion and birth control are bad, more babies is good, but making sure they're raised in poverty is also good because we don't want to support them with health care and welfare safety nets.
Meanwhile I don't even *** have or want kids and I think we should be taking better care of our environment.
Odin.Jassik said: »
Altimaomega said: »
Also, if "climate change" is COMPLETE CRAP. Why do you feel the need to burden everyone with less jobs and more expensive power?
Why, exactly, can't green they find work in green technologies? I still can't wrap my head around why apparently a bio-reactor or nuclear power plant requires less workers than a coal plant, for example.
Bismarck.Ramyrez said: »
I still find it funny that most of those with the political belief that destroying the environment is okay
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bismarck.Ramyrez said: »
I still find it funny that most of those with the political belief that destroying the environment is okay
Speaking on a nationwide, party-line level.
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Altimaomega said: »
Also, if "climate change" is COMPLETE CRAP. Why do you feel the need to burden everyone with less jobs and more expensive power?
Why, exactly, can't green they find work in green technologies? I still can't wrap my head around why apparently a bio-reactor or nuclear power plant requires less workers than a coal plant, for example.
Modernized ANYTHING takes less people to run. Let's live in the stone age where it took 12 people to kill a mammoth, that's HELP I AM TRAPPED IN 2006 PLEASE SEND A TIME MACHINE.
[+]
We should never use the excuse "but jerbs" as a reason to not innovate or automate something.
[+]
Bismarck.Ramyrez said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bismarck.Ramyrez said: »
I still find it funny that most of those with the political belief that destroying the environment is okay
Speaking on a nationwide, party-line level.
I could say that all liberals are anti-success and wishes to keep everyone down to their level.
Nobody who's a conservative is anti-environment, we just believe that there is a better way of achieving that without forcing it down everyone's throats.
Odin.Jassik said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Altimaomega said: »
Also, if "climate change" is COMPLETE CRAP. Why do you feel the need to burden everyone with less jobs and more expensive power?
Why, exactly, can't green they find work in green technologies? I still can't wrap my head around why apparently a bio-reactor or nuclear power plant requires less workers than a coal plant, for example.
Modernized ANYTHING takes less people to run. Let's live in the stone age where it took 12 people to kill a mammoth, that's HELP I AM TRAPPED IN 2006 PLEASE SEND A TIME MACHINE.
Less people means less errors, and would you want a lot of people working in a business where an error can lead to a civilization being wiped off the earth?
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bismarck.Ramyrez said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Bismarck.Ramyrez said: »
I still find it funny that most of those with the political belief that destroying the environment is okay
Speaking on a nationwide, party-line level.
I could say that all liberals are anti-success and wishes to keep everyone down to their level.
Nobody who's a conservative is anti-environment, we just believe that there is a better way of achieving that without forcing it down everyone's throats.
You're not saying you're "anti-environment", but at least on a national level, Republican politicians are endorsing policies and corporations that essentially are. Just because they say they're not "against the environment" doesn't mean they're exactly pro-conservation.
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Altimaomega said: »
Also, if "climate change" is COMPLETE CRAP. Why do you feel the need to burden everyone with less jobs and more expensive power?
Why, exactly, can't green they find work in green technologies? I still can't wrap my head around why apparently a bio-reactor or nuclear power plant requires less workers than a coal plant, for example.
Modernized ANYTHING takes less people to run. Let's live in the stone age where it took 12 people to kill a mammoth, that's HELP I AM TRAPPED IN 2006 PLEASE SEND A TIME MACHINE.
Less people means less errors, and would you want a lot of people working in a business where an error can lead to a civilization being wiped off the earth?
[+]
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Asura.Kingnobody said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Altimaomega said: »
Also, if "climate change" is COMPLETE CRAP. Why do you feel the need to burden everyone with less jobs and more expensive power?
Why, exactly, can't green they find work in green technologies? I still can't wrap my head around why apparently a bio-reactor or nuclear power plant requires less workers than a coal plant, for example.
Modernized ANYTHING takes less people to run. Let's live in the stone age where it took 12 people to kill a mammoth, that's HELP I AM TRAPPED IN 2006 PLEASE SEND A TIME MACHINE.
Less people means less errors, and would you want a lot of people working in a business where an error can lead to a civilization being wiped off the earth?
I'd want as many QUALIFIED people as necessary. But why are "jobs" always given as an excuse for refusing to move into the 21st century with infrastructure, then?
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2025 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.