Ophidian Trident Vs Qatsunoci +1

Hey everyone,

So with the release of the new skirmish weapons and such, I've seen the qatsunoci +1 have augs placed where the base damage outdoes the Trident. However, does this alone make it worth replacing the Ophidian Trident in Fractures and other end-game content? Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thank you ^-^

afaik, Skirmish weapon have better delay, for 4-6 hit sets. and dmg wise is better than the Trident.

I put trident in storage for now and changed over to Qat+1... with dmg+24, str+6 and acc+8 augment. I have a capped haste 5 hit again, so I like it personally.

well it's a lot easier to make a good hit build with Qatsunoci +1, also higher base dmg boosts your jump and ws damage. finally if you can get an augment of at least +22 DMG Qatsunoci +1 will start even winning on just raw dps outside of ws's and jumps vs Ophidian Trident.

Upukirex of course is still king.

:o oh snap. did that come from a +1 or a +2 V. Stone?

+2 stone... first try.

Do Ceizn Legs with 1-2% DA beat out Rank15 A Path Mikinaak Legs? Think Ceizn Legs have 24 STR, Ceizn have 28, Miki has considerably more attack but doesn't have DA

While DRG WS are naturally att deprived, I think 4% DA and greater STR would win out in non acc situations (most). I would still think M15 Legs would win in situations were accuracy is an issue.

The loss of 25 att and 20 acc for 4 str and 3-4% DA is nasty stay with rank 15 mikinaak.

the lost of 25 atk and 20 acc is nothing depending the gear you use and the buff you have.

Spreadsheets show otherwise.

Ceizn with 4% DA are showing that they beat M15 Legs on Delve Bosses under full buff situations.

WS Damage with Ceizn: 2441
WS Damage with M15: 2416