Valefor.Cowrevenge said:
»Its a waste cause he will end up with 1.25GB with the other one.
Nothing wrong with a hybrid drive, but I don't see the point since, he would have a large secondary drive anyway. Also Hybrids are slower in general use than a real SSD.
The higher resolution can actually cause your frame rates to drop. You wont notice the difference in image, but will notice the slow downs.
Valefor.Cowrevenge said:
»A second edit, Hybrids are way out of budget, because your also paying for the higher storage.
I'm not sure you're understanding what people are talking about. You can get external hard drive cases that let you put a old internal harddrive in and then plug it into your computer. They are very cheap 5-15 dollars and work very nice. I have one that I stuck in a 80 gig from a old laptop to both recover files and then use as storage.
As far as hybrids go they are far cheaper than SSD with the large disk storage because disk drive are far cheaper. The SSD part stores common use stuff like OS and other common use programs. The more you use it the more it learns what to keep ready and gets faster and faster.
I also saw you listed Ram that was ddr3 1866 but you ignore the CL where the CL on the one you listed is CL10 that being latency or how long it waits before it starts responding. Having the one number being large wont matter as much if the CL is also high. Here is link to explain it better.
http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/Understanding-RAM-Timings/26/2