Another Pro Choice Vs Pro Life Thread |
||
|
Another pro choice vs pro life thread
Let's keep this civil. It's a wonder this thread made it to page
Eugene said: » Carbuncle.Ianpyst said: » What is considered to be alive must fulfill all seven of the Living Processes: Moves, reproduction, sensitivity (knowledge of your surroundings), grows, respiration, excretion, nutrition (feed). Sperm, and eggs for that matter, are not alive. The profound point being? Gilgamesh.Tenshibaby said: » Bahamut.Jetackuu said: » for somebody speaking of not being qualified to say things you sure like to pull numbers out of your ***. as for a "soul" there's no evidence for such a thing so it should be dismissed. I don't know where you come to the conclusions of the bold. And there is PLENTY of evidence for a soul. Rock-solid proof that meet's your pedestrian criteria? Probably not. But then you don't matter anyway. Bold proclamations from the person to whom I responded apparently flew by your radar undetected, so what faith would I have in your intellectual requirements for deeper meaning? It'd be like granting a PhD to a kindergartener who failed finger-painting. This could be a forum about the life cycle of unicorns and you'd still have no point without evidence. You don't score points for declaring you've won a debate so as they say - put up or shut up. Plenty of evidence for a soul? Show us. Let's see how long it takes before you call someone intellectually bankrupt for not taking your statements on faith. Wait.. you did it already. Gilgamesh.Tenshibaby said: » Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: » We went over the flaws of adoption some pages ago, how about responding to this points with your own? I don't think you've noticed that most people here are not completely pro-abortion. Most have said that it's circumstantially acceptable. Cerberus.Sevvy said: » no but it makes you look like a fool. no there is no evidence for a soul, none. Ah the irony... wasted on so many people. Evidence =/= proof. Also, acknowledging the (correcting for spelling) impossibility of proving something does in NO WAY convey an impossibility of the existence of the thing. Can you prove that your mom loves you? Can you prove that clowns make you wet your pants? Can you prove that Adele is your favorite solo artist? While all of these things are probably true, you have no proof. You may have evidence, such as dressing up as Adele on weekends or video of your mom making your bed and laying out your clothes every day, but this is not proof. Yet the lack of proof is glaring. Ever heard the saying "Absence of proof is not proof of absence"? I apologize for the spelling error as I am on a tiny laptop sitting in the corner at work as I respond to these threads.
You are correct in a sense that there doesn't need to be evidence to prove anything. How can one prove their love for someone? I do get you there BUT I do feel that something so monumental as a soul should have more of a background then "it's there because [person/church/corporation X] told you it was there." The problem with these discussions is that the circle will never end. There is no end point. These ideas spawn our own opinons and we usually stick to them unless something drastic happens within our own life. While I am pro-choice, I am not going to condemn those who are pro-life, but that doesn't mean I am going to agree with what you have to say. I am glad the thread has taken a civil tone until very recently and look foward to discussing my ideas with the throng of others that lurk the site. I'm not going to make any open judgements, but I'll outline some stuff.
Bringing gametes into the argument only serves as a distraction. Nobody, at least legally speaking, is going to try and argue that unused sperm or eggs are people slaughtered en masse. Bringing them into the argument creates the illusion that the debate can be reduced further back, when in fact for practical purposes it can't. The argument is "does life begin at conception?" It isn't about gametes. Also, by making the claim that gametes aren't alive you are also necessarily claiming that humans fundamentally come from a non-living source. I don't think that's an argument that anyone really wants to make. One other thing I would like to point out is that the abortion debate isn't a question about whether you have to abort or not. People who fall under pro-choice are in every right to not exercise their right to abort. If you are staunchly pro-life then the question becomes a matter of whether you want to bar others from making a choice. I'm not making a moral claim either direction, but it is something to consider. Eugene said: » I mean, if you just wanted to just be offensive and arrogant you got that point across pretty nicely. Hey.. I don't live in my grandma's basement :(
..I live in her attic.. Holy ***, I went to Dynamis and this happened.
Gilgamesh.Tenshibaby said: » Eugene said: » I mean, if you just wanted to just be offensive and arrogant you got that point across pretty nicely. I'm really not sure how anyone can make the argument for a girl raped by a family member (let's say her father) to be force to carry to term and give birth to that child.
There is no good that can arise whatsoever in that circumstance. It's bad for everyone involved and for society as well. Can a pro-life person give me one example of any good that does? Cerberus.Sevvy said: » You are correct in a sense that there doesn't need to be evidence to prove anything. How can one prove their love for someone? I do get you there BUT I do feel that something so monumental as a soul should have more of a background then "it's there because [person/church/corporation X] told you it was there." I think we need to settle on what 'life' is and what the difference is between 'alive' and 'living.'
Leviathan.Chaosx said: » I'm really not sure how anyone can make the argument for a girl raped by a family member (let's say her father) to be force to carry to term and give birth to that child. Gilgamesh.Tenshibaby said: » What is to separate us from another mass with equal protons, neutrons, and electrons? The arrangement of such sub-atomic particles? Gilgamesh.Tenshibaby said: » Eugene said: » I mean, if you just wanted to just be offensive and arrogant you got that point across pretty nicely. Are you serious?!? You obviously didn't read this... Caitsith.Zahrah said: » Nevill said: » Here's another debatable question: Why the hell is it so hard to adopt. How many people do you think would carry the child to term if there was a family there to adopt this child. I think abortion should be reformed, not abolished. I'm absolutely for adoption, but they need to allow more leeway. I have no idea why the process is so hard in the US. My German aunt and uncle adopted their daughters from the Czech Republic over a decade ago. It took them months to make the adoption final (of course they have to take the time to do a thorough evaluation of the family adopting), but I think that the adoption laws in the US are more stringent than in Europe for some reason. If I remember correctly, they had a disappointing five years before the adoption of my cousins. (Moms bailing out in the last minute and what not, which can be understandable.) It was an emotional roller coaster for my aunt and uncle in those five years. What's really bad now is my cousin who was two at the time of the adoption has some really bizarre psychological problems. (I think they let my cousins know too early that they were adopted.) My cousin and uncle do not speak to each other in any capacity. They completely indulged both of them, I guess to compensate for all the years that both wanted children so badly, but the older one has just turned out rotten! It makes me so sad that my aunt has to go through the stress of having such an ingrate in her home. Her younger sister is well mannered and very loving. I think she saw some really terrible behaviors from her birth mother that she may or may not remember to this day. When I was about twelve or thirteen we went over for our annual visit after the adoption. I saw her get on top of a stuffed bear and mimic sex. There's no way that she had any concept of what she was doing, but even at that age, it disturbed me that she must have seen it. The last time I went to Germany in 2007, I was home alone with both my cousins. I heard them get into a small skirmish. When I went in to intervene, the older one had the younger one cornered. She didn't see me as I entered the kitchen behind her. I watched her completely wail on her younger sister before I jumped in, pulled her hand back, and gave her the verbal finger wag of a lifetime. My brother went to visit with his son more recently. He also caught our older cousin beating the younger one closed-fisted. Yeah...Both my brother and I "got into it" in our childhood, but never as malicious as that, and never in our teens! I'm really afraid that the older one has serious rage issues. The older one consistently has terrible performance in school, constantly lies, etc. It's just bad. I jumped on Skype with my German family on Christmas Eve. It took every ounce of restraint not to ream that girl for her horrible behavior. It wouldn't do any good anyway. My brother and I have both tried to speak to her. All of my cousins and second cousins who are all in their twenties or early thirties have tried. We've got nothing! What scares me now is that she has her first BF. She's going to get pregnant. I know it. Sorry to dump family drama, but yeah...Her sister is the sweetest thing on the planet. Adoption can be a double-edged sword. "A Tale of Two Siblings"? Or this... Caitsith.Zahrah said: » Just wondering, but do any other states impose this law where the mother must have an ultrasound and/or a sonogram before going through with an abortion, or is it just Texas? This is a relatively new law here. Not sure if it was passed or was just hear-say or whatever. Also, I do legitimately feel bad for a couple of guy friends whose GFs had their pregnancies nixed. One of which, had an abortion three times with HIM! Who knows how many she had with others, if she did? They both had their degrees, were settled into their careers, he bought his house, and they had the finances. Geez! He could have taken care of a child on his own! It disgusted me, because that very night she joined us at the bar. She had those vics and booze, and acted as though nothing had happened. The guy, on the other hand, was distraught. She basically used abortions as birth control all three times. I can understand one "oops", but three?!? I've only run into one other girl in college who did the same. I think I've already dumped that story in another thread. A couple of friends and I walked in on her having a train run on her, so she was that type of girl. I base my opinions off of life experience just as I assume everyone else here does! Thanks for assuming we all live in our grandparents' hidy-hole! EDIT: To repeat Sparth, "What arrogance!" Eugene said: » Leviathan.Chaosx said: » I'm really not sure how anyone can make the argument for a girl raped by a family member (let's say her father) to be force to carry to term and give birth to that child. However since we are talking religiously, well the bible has lots of incest in it, so I can see why it's justified. god says it's fine. Posting on the internet = living in parents' basement. Except for the person making that claim. (Which imo is probably the only one who actually does, lol) It's one of the laws of the internet. Just like there are no females.
Eugene said: » That's simply a basic tenet of chemistry. Molecules arranged in different ways exhibit different properties. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Eugene said: » Leviathan.Chaosx said: » I'm really not sure how anyone can make the argument for a girl raped by a family member (let's say her father) to be force to carry to term and give birth to that child. However since we are talking religiously, well the bible has lots of incest in it, so I can see why it's justified. god says it's fine. There's an awful lot of assumptions made there. Inbreeding isn't healthy, but it isn't a guaranteed death sentence either. There may be emerging genetic problems, there may not be. I was also making an argument for a side, I personally wasn't saying that the woman should or shouldn't carry to term. In any event I don't think as a matter of legally debate that anyone is going to say inbreeding or incest is good. Someone pro-life would say you're punishing a newly created individual for something they happened to them through circumstances outside their control. Gilgamesh.Tenshibaby said: » Eugene said: » That's simply a basic tenet of chemistry. Molecules arranged in different ways exhibit different properties. EDIT: Oh you mean to say because we haven't created life in a laboratory it must not be possible to happen without some divine intervention. That's a dangerous assertion to make when you yourself make claims that things can exist outside evidence. Also, we've made amino acids and simple proteins in the lab. In conditions mimicking early earth. Do I really need to text my chem-engineers and chem-biologists?
Gilgamesh.Tenshibaby said: » Cerberus.Sevvy said: » You are correct in a sense that there doesn't need to be evidence to prove anything. How can one prove their love for someone? I do get you there BUT I do feel that something so monumental as a soul should have more of a background then "it's there because [person/church/corporation X] told you it was there." Gilgamesh.Tenshibaby said: » Cerberus.Sevvy said: » You are correct in a sense that there doesn't need to be evidence to prove anything. How can one prove their love for someone? I do get you there BUT I do feel that something so monumental as a soul should have more of a background then "it's there because [person/church/corporation X] told you it was there." Your beliefs are somewhat derived by what you are taught. Whether it is the guiding principle of your thoughts or simply a small portions, the things you are taught from your parents, church, school, friends, TV, internet, etc. will play an impact on what you believe and what you dont believe. I was raised a strict Catholic. My parents came from Ireland so they professed all this ***too. When I was 14 I was booted from my home because my thoughts were not in line with their thoughts. I just see the poison that can be spewed that will twist the thoughts of those around them. I am by no means saying that believing in a soul is poison, but it is a product of your upbringing, your culture, and everything else around you. Be careful not to confuse your experiences with all experiences. I'm truly sorry you had bad experience with growing up with religion; that doesn't make it a universal.
Gilgamesh.Tenshibaby said: » Eugene said: » I mean, if you just wanted to just be offensive and arrogant you got that point across pretty nicely. For such a lofty intellectual so insulted by the base creatures on this forum responding to your posts you seem to have a rough time grasping rudimentary reading skills. Adoption and all its pros/cons were covered already. Again, add something to the conversation other than your posturing. Are all ascended beings so versed in non-sequiturs? Quote: I don't think people believe in a soul simply out of being told so. There is no shortage whatsoever of anecdotal stories of something about us separate from our physical beings. Also, most, if not all cultures have historically believed in a soul/spirit. The way I see it, I am not the same entity as something with my identical chemical makeup. What is to separate us from another mass with equal protons, neutrons, and electrons? The arrangement of such sub-atomic particles? The bandwagon fallacy and an appeal to antiquity? No shortage of UFO sightings mean that UFOs are real and we're all just too stupid to not take eyewitness accounts as gospel. Show me some evidence for souls please. |
||
|
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2026 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|
||