Sylph.Tigerwoods said:
E3
E3
batman looks like press x to attack, press y to counter
The real problem with Kinect - it endangers household objects. With a controller, even a Wiimote, you can still rage by squeezing or tossing the controller. With Kinect...the *** are you gonna do? Grab the closest object and toss it.
There goes grandma's ashes.
There goes grandma's ashes.
[+]
Sylph.Tigerwoods said:
batman looks like press x to attack, press y to counter
If it's anything like Asylum it isn't. Asylum was very very good.
Ramuh.Haseyo said:
The real problem with Kinect - it endangers household objects. With a controller, even a Wiimote, you can still rage by squeezing or tossing the controller. With Kinect...the *** are you gonna do? Grab the closest object and toss it.
There goes grandma's ashes.
There goes grandma's ashes.
that was the funniest thing i heard all day.
no wonder you are called proyo
Any doubts I had about Skyrim is now gone. Was a little worried about the simplified direction they were heading in (no stats and spellmaking? the hell?) but at this point, I don't care. The game just looks fun and for once, well animated.
Phoenix.Ingraham said:
Any doubts I had about Skyrim is now gone. Was a little worried about the simplified direction they were heading in (no stats? the hell?) but at this point, I don't care. The game just looks fun.
Yeah seriously. Was a bit disappointed that there's only 3 factions though and no dark brotherhood because in oblivion the dark brotherhood and mages guild were the best guilds I thought.
Ramuh.Thunderz said:
COD time
[+]
Ramuh.Rowland said:
Is there a link to what you guys are watching?
http://www.gametrailers.com/netstorage/e3/e3-live.html
Valefor.Slipispsycho said:
Ramuh.Thunderz said:
COD time
At least they spice up the guns each time. Halo just removes more guns >:
Ramuh.Rowland said:
Is there a link to what you guys are watching?
Wtf deadliest warrior
I was expecting COD
/rage
I was expecting COD
/rage
Yeah but they never change the game play up any =/ I mean I understand why.. They have a formula that obviously works, most people rave over whatever the newest COD is, but a game that doesn't change, gets stale, at least for me.
I really can't justify buying an entirely new game in a series, just because the graphics got a tweak and there are some new weapons and maps to play on..
I really can't justify buying an entirely new game in a series, just because the graphics got a tweak and there are some new weapons and maps to play on..
Valefor.Slipispsycho said:
Yeah but they never change the game play up any =/ I mean I understand why.. They have a formula that obviously works, most people rave over whatever the newest COD is, but a game that doesn't change, gets stale, at least for me.
FPS in general have this sort of problem
COD is just the same formula on crack + Level up system
Honestly I just play it to f--- around and play with friends
I would never play this game solo
so when they said cod was coming up next...
Valefor.Slipispsycho said:
Yeah but they never change the game play up any =/ I mean I understand why.. They have a formula that obviously works, most people rave over whatever the newest COD is, but a game that doesn't change, gets stale, at least for me.
I really can't justify buying an entirely new game in a series, just because the graphics got a tweak and there are some new weapons and maps to play on..
I really can't justify buying an entirely new game in a series, just because the graphics got a tweak and there are some new weapons and maps to play on..
The MW ones have been pretty big increases each time. World at War and Black Ops were downgrades.
I understand your point, but if you want to move where the multiplayer crowd is moving, you basically have to get each installment.
Lakshmi.Mabrook said:
OH MY GOD A NEW MEGAMAN LEGENDS!!
Lakshmi.Mabrook said:
Phoenix.Ingraham said:
Lakshmi.Mabrook said:
OH MY GOD A NEW MEGAMAN LEGENDS!!
It's for 3DS though.
Battlefield Changes stuff up, but that's more than likely attributed to the fact that so much time passes in between each installment. Still, none are really the same, they play completely differently.. They have a lot of the same basic elements (the choice in vehicles probably being a major selling point) but they play out completely differently.. Try BF2:MC on PS2, then try BF2 on PC, or BF1942 on PC then BF2 on PC, or BF2:MC on PS2, then BF2:BC on PS3, or any combination of those, they're all drastically different.. Then try COD:MW, COD:WaW, COD3 on any system and they're all so much alike that you don't even really need time to adjust, just need to learn the maps.
Yeah they had a video on gametrailers about legends 3 3 or 4 months ago. I think it was late 2012 they were aiming for. And yes 3DS
Ramuh.Haseyo said:
Valefor.Slipispsycho said:
Yeah but they never change the game play up any =/ I mean I understand why.. They have a formula that obviously works, most people rave over whatever the newest COD is, but a game that doesn't change, gets stale, at least for me.
I really can't justify buying an entirely new game in a series, just because the graphics got a tweak and there are some new weapons and maps to play on..
I really can't justify buying an entirely new game in a series, just because the graphics got a tweak and there are some new weapons and maps to play on..
The MW ones have been pretty big increases each time. World at War and Black Ops were downgrades.
I understand your point, but if you want to move where the multiplayer crowd is moving, you basically have to get each installment.
I never found any difference between Battlefields except maps >:
Excited for 3 though.
Excited for 3 though.
Ramuh.Haseyo said:
I never found any difference between Battlefields except maps >:
What are you on aboot
DAT PRONE!
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2025 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.