Meh, AI dont compete with physical labor. Robots are the competitors for these, and unfortunelly human has the advantage in that field because they are cheaper, and with major unemployeement from jobs being taken by AI, the price for physical labor will drop even further.
Humankind is rushing toward a new age of slavery.
Not gonna happen in my generation, possibly neither in the next one or two, but at this pace, soon
To be honest though, I'd rather automation take the heavy labour jobs and leave artistic endeavours to actual people who enjoy them. The downside to even this, however, is that you know none of the cost-savings would be reflected on the price for the product or service, nor to the salaries of the front-line staff.
That said, "AI" is still hilarious. And I'd be willing to put money down that the costs associated with maintenance and production errors are going to compound on the cost of the "AI" workers and probably never see net profit.
And I'd be willing to put money down that the costs associated with maintenance and production errors are going to compound on the cost of the "AI" workers and probably never see net profit.
when artificial intelligence is used within the boundary of its capabilities, it can improve a worker’s performance by as much as 40% compared with workers who don’t use it.
But when AI is used outside that boundary to complete a task, worker performance drops by an average of 19 percentage points.
In other words, if your company already has employees with a specific knowledge, AI error doesn't matter. But if a company has no employee owning that skill, that is when the error will affect the employee performance.
That being said, I am curious at employee's productivity using google v.s AI for some positions. I still use google for 90% of the daily work, and I often feel totally useless without google. I only use ChatGPT or generative AI in 3% of my daily work max.
I guess I am probably not competent enough at using generative AI, or google is already very good for many things lol.
AI offerings are maturing at light speed compared with how long it took till google became the de facto search engine. It wasnt 2 years since we heard about chatGPT, and nowaday you cant talk about future without considering integrating some sort of AI into business.
Even for the enduser, its only a matter of time till a new culture is created, that will instinctively search something with AI instead of searching it directly in a searching engine.
AI is a natural evolution to our current age. We briefly had the so called information age, where having information equates power. Nowadays information is abundant. Everyone have it, but very few can make sense of it. So, we are in the age of knowledge: where the power belongs to people who have information and can make knowledge out of it.
AI is there to close the bridge between people and knowledge: now, they can leverage technology to process information and spit what is the real value to users to make decisions, take actions, generate even more value
Not really, imo. AI technology existed farrrr before ChatGPT become popular. It has always hindered by hardware processing power.
I think deep learning techology started way back in 1965? And related theory existed 20 years earlier than that. But first breakthrough happened in 1997, when IBM deep blue beat human world champion in chess.
Another breakthrough happened in 2016, when AlphaGo beat human champion in Go(this game requires more processing power than chess)
Generative AI popped in around 2018 but people have been working on ImageNet(visual database) for it since 2006.
tl;dr: AI technology didn't magically pop out of nowhere. It took decades of techology advancement until we see chatGPT today. It is not nearly as easy as people said. Each breakthrough can take decades of work until it happens.
Since this is new techology, of course people will be excited to explore the potential. But how useful it is still entirely depends on the nature of the job. People have been using algorithms in business for decades, chatGPT is just another option for such jobs.
Im finiishing reading my current manga series tonight, and i would like to try something riskier next.
I have a couple of series that are complete but with translation unfinished.
So i wonder if our current technology already created some sort of scanning to capture image in japanese to translate to english.
If i can find something like that, i could try picking up some scanlating that was dropped many years ago, and conclude those series i never got to see the end
Take heed - don't bother trying to farm Odin on VE / E, I'm at 500+ attempts and have received no item drop whatsoever when I'm solo with Trusts.
I have a Gere Ring, Zantetsuken, helmet and chest from group VD drops but I never managed to get a Freke Ring for my BLM. Odin just absolutely does not drop anything unless you are on a higher difficulty. Don't waste your time / merits like I have.
I have a Gere Ring, Zantetsuken, helmet and chest from group VD drops
You cant say stuff doesnt drop on VE/E when you literally have half the loot pool already, including the two more common pieces (Helm/Body, anecdotal statement based on my own experience of capping out on helm/body before I've seen 2 of any other item)
Just to make sure theres no confusion on what you said: "I'm solo with trusts" implies you + 5 trusts, not you + your blm + 4 trusts.
Just to make sure theres no confusion on what you said: "I'm solo with trusts" implies you + 5 trusts, not you + your blm + 4 trusts.
Correct - when I'm doing the VE / E runs I am solo on MNK/WAR with 5 Trusts and TH 4 gear.
All of the previous drops were obtained from 6 player group runs on VD. I have not seen a Freke Ring, Geirrothr or Zantetsuken X drop (the only three drops I have a chance to obtain) in over 500+ runs when I'm doing the VE / E runs by myself with Trusts.
Lilith's drop rate on VE is way higher than Odin. I came in at around 170ish runs for full Malignance plus earring / sword doing VE only with her.
This is a thread that I found on another website I post at. It can be really really interesting. I thought it deserved a place here.
Post your random thoughts for the day here, or anything else that intrigues you.
For starters, is it possible to give constructive critism to someone who doesn't have a neck? I totally just walked by a girl who didn't. Someone isn't getting a necklace for Valentines day!
And who decided black and white can't be colors? I want to say a racist. I really do.