Post deleted by User.
California Debates 'yes Means Yes' Sex Assault Law |
||
Forum » Everything Else »
Politics and Religion
»
California debates 'yes means yes' sex assault law
California debates 'yes means yes' sex assault law
So what's the final solution here?
A woman with a penis is kinda of a turn off though.
Odin.Jassik said: » Again, it would probably depend on the prosecutor. It takes little more than the insinuation to cause serious damage to someone's life. Simply being charged with a crime can be detrimental. Bolded caught my eye. Had a relationship that started in 7th grade and lasted until the start of the 12th grade. Being so young and immature about it all, we both kind of created an ugly situation when it did end, we didn't know how to act around each other, feelings were still there, etc. The mother that never much cared for me convinced her to go to the county prosecutor's office and file 2 charges, terroristic threatening and sexual assault. Actually found out it was the mother a good ways down the road when we randomly bumped into each other at a store, talked some, and reconnected on Facebook. Annnnyways.. Queue a nifty experience of being arrested in school, having an EPO put against you, and 3ish months of court room antics by an overzealous prosecutor with 0 evidence (she couldn't even stick to a single story about when any of this supposedly happened), followed by a dismissal and expongement with the agreement to attend an anger management class and sexual counseling. Few years down the road, I apply for military service. The opportunity seemed right for my situation, the idea of serving gave purpose, and the opportunities it would open seemed like a good deal. Guess what they found? Guess what they denied a waiver for? These things really can't be taken lightly in this day an age. As said, even accusations can be incredibly damaging. That's a seriously scary thing. I wasn't his once because a few friends of mine had been involved in some burglaries while I was out of state in college. I was never charged, but the police came to my work several times to basically harass me. When my perspective employer called for a reference, my previous employer told him about it and he decided he wasn't comfortable hitting someone suspected of burglary.
I have a friend who lost his scholarship because of a rape accusation. The girl was date raped, but not by him. Of course everything was sorted out, but he still lost his scholarship and couldn't afford to stay in school. The victim actually wrote a letter to the committee to try and get them to reinstate it, but they didn't listen. Valefor.Applebottoms
Offline
Leviathan.Chaosx said: » A woman with a penis is kinda of a turn off though. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » A woman with a penis is kinda of a turn off though. *Thailand intensifies* Valefor.Applebottoms said: » Leviathan.Chaosx said: » A woman with a penis is kinda of a turn off though. Great philosophical debate time. Life or death, which do you bang? Chick with a *** -=OR=- Man with a Vagina? "Neither" is not an option. Your eyeballs will be sexually penetrated by rabid dogs if you choose neither. You must have intercourse with one. yay chicks with ***
Leviathan.Comeatmebro
Online
the question is vague, are you bottoming for the *** or no
if not, is a reacharound required is the man with a vagina a manly man or is it something like justin bieber so many possibilities Valefor.Applebottoms
Offline
I always thought having a mangina goes with drinking Bailey's from a shoe.
SOMEONE PLEASE GET THAT REFERENCE. Valefor.Applebottoms said: » I always thought having a mangina goes with drinking Bailey's from a shoe. SOMEONE PLEASE GET THAT REFERENCE. OLD GREGG. LOL Odin.Zicdeh said: » Valefor.Applebottoms said: » Leviathan.Chaosx said: » A woman with a penis is kinda of a turn off though. Great philosophical debate time. Life or death, which do you bang? Chick with a *** -=OR=- Man with a Vagina? "Neither" is not an option. Your eyeballs will be sexually penetrated by rabid dogs if you choose neither. You must have intercourse with one. Valefor.Applebottoms
Offline
Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Odin.Zicdeh said: » Valefor.Applebottoms said: » Leviathan.Chaosx said: » A woman with a penis is kinda of a turn off though. Great philosophical debate time. Life or death, which do you bang? Chick with a *** -=OR=- Man with a Vagina? "Neither" is not an option. Your eyeballs will be sexually penetrated by rabid dogs if you choose neither. You must have intercourse with one. Valefor.Applebottoms said: » Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Odin.Zicdeh said: » Valefor.Applebottoms said: » Leviathan.Chaosx said: » A woman with a penis is kinda of a turn off though. Great philosophical debate time. Life or death, which do you bang? Chick with a *** -=OR=- Man with a Vagina? "Neither" is not an option. Your eyeballs will be sexually penetrated by rabid dogs if you choose neither. You must have intercourse with one. Leviathan.Comeatmebro said: » the question is vague, are you bottoming for the *** or no if not, is a reacharound required is the man with a vagina a manly man or is it something like justin bieber so many possibilities The question is intentionally vague, that's what makes it a thought experiment. You're supposed to weigh your entire perspective and then make a decision. For example, maybe you've already had anal sex with a woman before, in which case Dickgirl wouldn't be anything but nine inches of a new experience, which with deft hands you could avoid. Or maybe you find more than just the genitals an important aspect of what identifies a sex (Sexual Dimorphism). Maybe you'd rather go "Burlap sack" and try your hardest to make sure the only skin-to-skin contact is tubesnake in bolognavice. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » The choice is clear, the rabid dogs. Well, you are flying the Russian flag, so anything you say can potentially be used by the KGB against you. Offline
Posts: 35422
Leviathan.Chaosx said: » A woman with a kid is kinda of a turn off though. Offline
Posts: 35422
*sexual harassment panda *
Offline
Posts: 35422
If anything happened to my wife, I would consider experimenting with either of the transexuals before I was casually involved in a woman with a child. If I were single and a woman with a child were interested in me, I would have to strongly consider the entire situation and *** whether or not I could handle always being second in her life, and if her second was better than first in the lives of other women. I don't say this as an insult; a single mother's first priority should be her child(ren). It's actually a statement my mother made to my stepfather before they were married; that I was always going to come first to her. And to his credit (and my mother's really) he answered "yes" to the question posed above. ...which is probably why I consider him more of a father than my biodad, as it were. So, personal exposition aside, yes. The short answer is that while women with children may not be an explicit "turn off", they certainly come with some philosophical decisions. Hey now don't put words in my mouth. Some women with kids desire sex more than women without any kids simply because they haven't had any in a long time.
Offline
Posts: 35422
I get that part but like Ram says there are some other issues to consider besides the milf aspect.
Offline
Posts: 35422
(incoming single mothers discussion) I will say though if the kid is old enough to not have a baby sitter. I have no objections to a single mother...
fonewear said: » I get that part but like Ram says there are some other issues to consider besides the milf aspect. Offline
Posts: 35422
Oh the milf aspect is the greatest just not the babysitting and watching terrible Disney movies.
I don't want to be a step dad basically. Not today at least. Maybe in the future. fonewear said: » Oh the milf aspect is the greatest just not the babysitting and watching terrible Disney movies. I don't want to be a step dad basically. I could definitely picture me making some milf's kid stop watching those 'terrible cartoon kids watch these days' and sit down and enjoy 152 episodes of the Twilight Zone.
Offline
Posts: 35422
|
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|