Execute Woman - Starving & Abusing 9-year-old

Way to read the whole post man!

So was this mad dog put down like she most definitely deserved for needlessly torturing and starving a child to death?

Her execution will give me much needed sustenance.

I have seen cases that go both ways. Like you mentioned I have seen terrible parents get their kids back over and over again.

I have also seen a case where a woman lost her three kids because she was unemployed for a period of about a month. Her previous employer, having not received any calls requesting references felt they should call social services. Even though she was providing for the children's basic needs, they determined that the way she was doing it was not sustainable (she was selling her personal belongings) and took the kids. When she got a job, which was within 2-3 weeks of them taking the kids, the state would not give them back. They had all kinds of stupid hoops she had to go through to get them. They wanted her to be employed for 1 month before getting them back, have the home inspected again when that time came, they even required she get a physical performed to show she was physically fit to care for children. It ended up taking her 3 months to get them back.

Maybe there was more going on, someone with a vendetta against her in the SS office, I don't know she never said anything about that. All I know was she was a good mother, the best she could be given the situation, and the system screwed her over.

(This wasn't just something I read about, it was a neighbor when I was growing up, I was friends with her son and she was friends with my own mother)

Yeah she is super dead.

So it's ok to just let them get off with a just punishment when they tortured someone? I think they should get that back at them.

I suggest you stop posting replies to me because I'm tempted to shove a proverbial boot up someone's ***. Harming children in any way shape or form fires me up to no end. To starve one to death? Don't even bother trying to reason with me.

I'll go you one further and suggest it doesn't matter whether it's a child or an adult.

Torturing someone to death deserves similar treatment.

A needle is already more mercy than they deserve, but will have to suffice.

Unless of course those children happen to be palestinian. Then you're all for it.

Hypocrite

The penalty for such a crime should be euthanasia as is the case here. Saying the state is murdering someone is applying emotion.

Yeah she is super dead.

Not at all, it's legal murder, their cause of death is murder.

Their cause of death is execution.

"Murder" is an illegal killing.

The cause of death written on their death certificates is murder. (depending on area of course).

Too lazy to look further but it seems that not only are the trials more expensive, it costs about 2.3 million dollars to execute somebody in texas (the trial fee may be included in that).

Costs about $62 a day in maximum security in prison (again quick googling, not certain on accuracy), turns out if she lives for 50 years in there it'd come to about just under half the cost of her execution.

So yes, it's cheaper to let them rot in jail than to execute them.

North Korean labor camp.

Gotta think of opportunity costs, though. Prisons are overpopulated. *** be getting out early and ***because of this, so have to evaluate how much damage is done when they commit a new crime and got put back in (how much money in damages they did, and the price of the new court they go through) versus just having stayed in their full sentence to begin with (Of course this only applies to reoffenders, lol)

yea, I pulled that out of my ***, but at the end of the day, the best suggestion has been made

I find it amusing that Jet, lord master of personal defense and gun rights (the ability for the individual to protect oneself with lethal force) is trying to moralize on the ability of the state to dole out capital punishment based on the sum will of the people (the legality of capital punishment per state).

I find it amusing that Jet, lord master of personal defense and gun rights (the ability for the individual to protect oneself with lethal force) is trying to moralize on the ability of the state to dole out capital punishment based on the sum will of the people (the legality of capital punishment per state).

Right?

Having his cake and eating it too, this one is.

Good job society: you murdered somebody, guilty or not, you murdered somebody.

Not at all, but I don't expect most of you to comprehend.

because we are all greatly inferior to this gas-station attendant.

don't forget it, you daft ***.

Popular =/= right and I'm for self defense, not killing somebody that's already neutralized as a threat to society.


You can find it amusing all you want.

Oh and inb4 the pro-life crowd talkin' about dead fetuses being murder 'n ***.

also: individual rights>state/federal in my book, always.