Cerberus.Wolfshadow said: »
Austar I'm 10 minutes from home, solve this thread by then or you're fired
Samurai Discussion #93520123 |
||
Samurai Discussion #93520123
Cerberus.Wolfshadow said: » Austar I'm 10 minutes from home, solve this thread by then or you're fired Cerberus.Wolfshadow
Offline
Well after failing to solve the mystery of the pharoah's tomb you kiiiinda need this to bounce back :<
Ramuh.Krizz said: » Leviathan.Dodu said: » And why are you publicly announcing issues of moderation? That's what personal messages are for. I know what you're allowed to do, but that doesn't make it any less inappropriate. There's a reason most of the world runs on reports filed in anonymity. Leviathan.Dodu said: » I know what you're allowed to do, but that doesn't make it any less inappropriate. There's a reason most of the world runs on reports filed in anonymity. Bismarck.Josiahkf said: » If anyone feels this thread is not accurately discussing the mechanics of the game... I already explained in detail why that's not happening. They're guessing when attack is more beneficial than attack speed. I even provided an analogy to show exactly why that kind of thing is dangerous. And despite argument to the contrary saying that its a completely unrelated issue, its almost identical. The general forum-going portion of the playerbase understands accuracy and attack speed a bit better than they did the in past, but next to none of them understand in depth matters of pDIF differences. Leviathan.Dodu said: » Ramuh.Krizz said: » Leviathan.Dodu said: » And why are you publicly announcing issues of moderation? That's what personal messages are for. I know what you're allowed to do, but that doesn't make it any less inappropriate. There's a reason most of the world runs on reports filed in anonymity. How's the game of pointing fingers going for you? Pretty sure Krizz is doing a fine job even if it pisses me off sometimes. Cerberus.Wolfshadow said: » Well after failing to solve the mystery of the pharoah's tomb you kiiiinda need this to bounce back :< Leviathan.Dodu said: » Are you kidding me? Look at the post above you. And why are you publicly announcing issues of moderation? That's what personal messages are for. they outlined when the whole "we are losing sponsorship" happened that they would be openly moderating. at this point it was quite a while ago, maybe a month or two. its in the rules also. edit: i have been beaten, sorry for double post. Leviathan.Dodu said: » Bismarck.Josiahkf said: » If anyone feels this thread is not accurately discussing the mechanics of the game... I already explained in detail why that's not happening. They're guessing when attack is more beneficial than attack speed. I even provided an analogy to show exactly why that kind of thing is dangerous. And despite argument to the contrary saying that its a completely unrelated issue, its almost identical. The general forum-going portion of the playerbase understands accuracy and attack speed a bit better than they did the in past, but next to none of them understand in depth matters of pDIF differences. Cerberus.Wolfshadow
Offline
Bahamut.Zellc said: » Leviathan.Dodu said: » Are you kidding me? Look at the post above you. And why are you publicly announcing issues of moderation? That's what personal messages are for. they outlined when the whole "we are losing sponsorship" happened that they would be openly moderating. at this point it was quite a while ago, maybe a month or two. its in the rules also. edit: i have been beaten, sorry for double post. Lakshmi.Jaerik said: » Admin and Moderator Procedure: - We will no longer attempt to "soft" correct differences with users over private messages, in order to be more consistent and visible in our disciplinary policies. - We are tentatively removing the soft prohibition on discussing disciplinary measures taken against a given user in public. (This means if someone is doing something blatantly wrong, it will be stated that they were banned in the thread.) I tried... :( Let's just go hang out in some theme song related thread, it's boring here.
Ramuh.Krizz said: » Leviathan.Dodu said: » Bismarck.Josiahkf said: » If anyone feels this thread is not accurately discussing the mechanics of the game... I already explained in detail why that's not happening. They're guessing when attack is more beneficial than attack speed. I even provided an analogy to show exactly why that kind of thing is dangerous. And despite argument to the contrary saying that its a completely unrelated issue, its almost identical. The general forum-going portion of the playerbase understands accuracy and attack speed a bit better than they did the in past, but next to none of them understand in depth matters of pDIF differences. Its a perfectly valid contribution. Opposition to untested, unqualified theorizing is completely necessary. i do not wish to join in the attack against dodu. like ena said there are some truths in what he said on page one.
i will say this though: there are many ways to get from point A to point B, what is optimal is left for the user to discern. attacking this thread because the sets that you or other self proclaimed "elite" players use is a poor way to contribute. rather than just saying people are flat out wrong, try posting some sets that you believe are another option for players who are seeking guidance to take notes from. no need for such volatility, we can communicate like civil people with a little effort. I use ye olde capped haste White Tathlum/Zelus Tiara/Tactical Mantle TP set, and I feel satisfied.
Yet I used to use the Theory 1 set or whichever. I haven't done any testing, but the extra couple points of haste feel gewd. |3 Bismarck.Elanabelle said: » With that in mind, I think it's ridiculous for a SAM to use White Tathlum, Unkai Mimikazari, and Tactical Mantle just so s/he can also use Zelus Tiara. Doing that surrenders (among other things) over 50 Attack from one's TP set (8 from Thew, 20 from Atheling, 15 from the penalty on Tactical, 3 from the STR from Bushinomimi/Thew, 5 from the Skill on Bushinomimi). This is my "insecure-about-my-TP-set" face: D: Bahamut.Zellc said: » attacking this thread because the sets that you or other self proclaimed "elite" players use is a poor way to contribute. But that's just it! I'm not claiming that what I'm doing or what I think is correct, and I'm certainly not saying anyone contributing is acting out of malice. All I'm saying is that that the OP, Ironguy, etc are not going to produce the results they're looking for, and that instead of compiling lists of what works for them, they should be PM'ing people who can actually do the work that needs to be done. Leviathan.Dodu said: » Bahamut.Zellc said: » attacking this thread because the sets that you or other self proclaimed "elite" players use is a poor way to contribute. But that's just it! I'm not claiming that what I'm doing or what I think is correct, and I'm certainly not saying anyone contributing is acting out of malice. All I'm saying is that that the OP, Ironguy, etc are not going to produce the results they're looking for, and that instead of compiling lists of what works for them, they should be PM'ing people who can actually do the work that needs to be done. while that does make sense, i fail to see how that is a contribution to the thread. if those people wanted to contribute to this thread they would get to it when they could. no real need to say anyone is inadequate to post something about a job that they take the time to post in a thread dedicated to the job. i just think it is very polite imo. Why is it when opposition surfaces in a thread, automatically its referred to as trolling? I think people need to learn what trolling is.
I know it's cool to hate on Dodu, but his points are valid. Lots of speculation being used here to push ideas without a lot to back them up.
Zellc said: i will say this though: there are many ways to get from point A to point B, what is optimal is left for the user to discern. attacking this thread because the sets that you or other self proclaimed "elite" players use is a poor way to contribute. Siren.Clinpachi said: » So the question i have at the moment is, so its a waste to go the zelus route on SAM correct? They're almost identical on stuff where you have no problem capping hitrate (somewhat favoring 6-hit, especially w/ Ganesha's Mala and/or haste buffs inflating the impact of the haste difference), but the moment acc starts to matter you'll find the 5-hit suffering in a big way. 6-hit can maintain meat instead of pizza over a greater range while still capping hitrate and still has the option for pizza after that. Quote: Also (and this may help those who don't know) it's a huge mistake to make only 1 WS set for SAM, you definitely want to do one with berserk up and down. 1) You tie use of each set to more factors than simply whether or not Zerk is up. Because Berserk is multiplicative rather than additive, it doesn't make the attack you already have any weaker provided you're not capping cRatio (variations in pDIF equations exist but you get the point). 2) You use SAM in a wide enough variety of conditions to justify differentiation. A pretty reasonable assumption, but if you only pull out SAM for a niche subset of NMs, especially in something like Voidwatch where there's no fodder for variety, then a capped cRatio set isn't doing anything for you. That said, differentiation may or may not even be needed right now given Faz/+1/R Mail. Leviathan.Draylo said: » Why is it when opposition surfaces in a thread, automatically its referred to as trolling? I think people need to learn what trolling is. Because he's not contributing and just causing ***for no reason. Bahamut.Serj said: » Leviathan.Draylo said: » Why is it when opposition surfaces in a thread, automatically its referred to as trolling? I think people need to learn what trolling is. Because he's not contributing and just causing ***for no reason. Having the correct answer is not a prerequisite for telling people that an answer is wrong. Fenrir.Nightfyre said: » I know it's cool to hate on Dodu, but his points are valid. Lots of speculation being used here to push ideas without a lot to back them up. Zellc said: i will say this though: there are many ways to get from point A to point B, what is optimal is left for the user to discern. attacking this thread because the sets that you or other self proclaimed "elite" players use is a poor way to contribute. so does that mean that you agree with dodu when he/she says that the people who posted the first few groups of item sets should not have posted/have no business posting what they think would be helpful to a person inquiring on a direction to go in terms of gear selection?(thats a run-on sentence and i apologize, i should have structured that question better.) maybe their current gear doesnt permit that they use what currently best in some slots. that doesnt make what they post any less helpful than the next persons post. everyone has an opinion on what they think could be best, and thats why posting the different option for tping was so helpful imo. I'd appreciate you rephrasing the first question, I'm not 100% sure what you're asking and I don't want to answer it wrong because I think it needs to be answered to clear up a misperception.
Quote: maybe their current gear doesnt permit that they use what currently best in some slots. that doesnt make what they post any less helpful than the next persons post. Quote: everyone has an opinion on what they think could be best, and thats why posting the different option for tping was so helpful imo. Fenrir.Nightfyre said: » You're still not getting this whole thing about opinions not bearing weight in an environment dictated entirely by algorithms, are you? i'm so aroused right now i don't know what to do with myself Carbuncle.Sevourn said: » Fenrir.Nightfyre said: » You're still not getting this whole thing about opinions not bearing weight in an environment dictated entirely by algorithms, are you? i'm so aroused right now i don't know what to do with myself I was just about to quote this. And into the txt document it goes. |
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|