Random Pish-Posh And Dribblety-Poop #12 |
||
Random Pish-Posh and Dribblety-Poop #12
Offline
Posts: 9772
You should just let it go Josi and trust your gut. leopards don't change their spots.
Asura.Kingnobody said: » The bombshell this week is that Loretta Lynch and James Comey not only gave immunity to Hillary’s closest co-conspirators Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson—who, despite being attorneys, destroyed evidence right and left—but, in a secret side deal, agreed to limit the FBI’s review of the Clinton team laptops to pre-January 2015 and to destroy the laptops when the FBI review was complete. There was no crime. This has been investigated to death. Nothing came of it. Your google skills and chain letters aren't more convincing than the FBI. Let it go. It's sad. Asura.Kingnobody said: » Then again, this article is all about the crimes committed by Clinton and her cronies. It outlines what they said, what they testified under oath, and what they did, and compares it to what they said, what they testified under oath, and what they did, using the law itself to show that what they said, what they testified under oath, and what they did was illegal because it contradicted with what they said, what they testified under oath, and what they did. So, there's no cover-ups being occurred as far as you are concerned, huh Pleebo?
Nixon has been convicted for far less than this. Cerberus.Pleebo said: » There was no crime. Care to explain why you say that? Besides your "FBI already investigated it" excuse on an article that accuses the FBI and Justice Department of covering up for Clinton. I wonder if you can see the problem with your whole argument now? Asura.Kingnobody said: » I wonder if you can see the problem with your whole argument now? Cerberus.Pleebo said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Then again, this article is all about the crimes committed by Clinton and her cronies. It outlines what they said, what they testified under oath, and what they did, and compares it to what they said, what they testified under oath, and what they did, using the law itself to show that what they said, what they testified under oath, and what they did was illegal because it contradicted with what they said, what they testified under oath, and what they did. Pleebo is going for the "willfully ignorant" defense route. Asura.Kingnobody said: » So, there's no cover-ups being occurred as far as you are concerned, huh Pleebo? And Nixon was never convicted. History. The more you know. Cerberus.Pleebo said: » No and that dumb article doesn't show any. I'm sure you think that worthless amalgam of conjecture and armchair lawyering you linked trumps an FBI investigation but it doesn't. I feel sorry for anyone else who had to read it. Cerberus.Pleebo said: » And Nixon was never convicted. History. The more you know. Offline
Posts: 35422
Obama do you have something you'd like to say ?
YouTube Video Placeholder fonewear said: » This thread should have ended 35 pates ago. For once we agree. Seen an awful lot of personal back and forth from people who know better, so one of you can bribe one of the greens to start a new one tomorrow. |
||
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.
|