It's been a week.
- What have you liked about the changes?
- What have you disliked?
- Do you have ideas for making it better?
Also, if you've got answers to those and you're not comfortable giving your opinion here, feel free to PM me.
Thanks!
--Rooks
P+R Changes, Feedback Edition
P+R changes, feedback edition
Seen no difference so far.
[+]
Honestly haven't been keeping up with it enough to really notice, I peek in it once in awhile and:
Except for a few extra posts because of typos, etc.
Valefor.Sehachan said: »
Seen no difference so far.
Except for a few extra posts because of typos, etc.
I don't know if this would be possible, but it would be better if there was some way to keep people from editing out the main point of a post in lieu of the minutia, since in can change the context of the post itself and the conversation can be manipulated.
If there was a need to divert, [/b] is always there, but the bulk of the post cannot be compromised.
You've got a lot more on your plate, though.
If there was a need to divert, [/b] is always there, but the bulk of the post cannot be compromised.
You've got a lot more on your plate, though.
Caitsith.Zahrah said: »
You've got a lot on your plate fatty
yeah! new p&r is bad! boycott!
[+]
Caitsith.Zahrah said: »
I don't know if this would be possible, but it would be better if there was some way to keep people from editing out the main point of a post in lieu of the minutia, since in can change the context of the post itself and the conversation can be manipulated.
If there was a need to divert, [/b] is always there, but the bulk of the post cannot be compromised.
You've got a lot more on your plate, though.
If there was a need to divert, [/b] is always there, but the bulk of the post cannot be compromised.
You've got a lot more on your plate, though.
Short of flagging edited posts for moderator review, I don't know how this could work. I get what you're asking, but I don't think I have any way to parse and evaluate English programmatically in a way that would achieve this.
[+]
Rooks said: »
Caitsith.Zahrah said: »
I don't know if this would be possible, but it would be better if there was some way to keep people from editing out the main point of a post in lieu of the minutia, since in can change the context of the post itself and the conversation can be manipulated.
If there was a need to divert, [/b] is always there, but the bulk of the post cannot be compromised.
You've got a lot more on your plate, though.
If there was a need to divert, [/b] is always there, but the bulk of the post cannot be compromised.
You've got a lot more on your plate, though.
Short of flagging edited posts for moderator review, I don't know how this could work. I get what you're asking, but I don't think I have any way to parse and evaluate English programmatically in a way that would achieve this.
Yeah, I thought that would be a longshot.
Reintroduce the edit function; but when someone edits their post they autoban themselves!
Valefor.Sehachan said: »
Reintroduce the edit function; but when someone edits their post they autoban themselves!
This idea is far more appealing than it should be.
"You get one shot; MAKE IT COUNT."
If this gives us a salary AH gems all the way!
Rooks said: »
- Do you have ideas for making it better?
When you close the particular thread, put some statistics:
# new posters posting in a P&R (Thanks for playing!)
# of posters topic-banned (no need to necessarily name & shame, unless desired)
# of reports (no need to break it down)
[+]
Ackeron said: »
If this gives us a salary AH gems all the way!
Rooks said: »
Short of flagging edited posts for moderator review, I don't know how this could work. I get what you're asking, but I don't think I have any way to parse and evaluate English programmatically in a way that would achieve this.
Yeah, then add this. That'll make people think twice about your sweet gig.
[+]
Caitsith.Zahrah said: »
Ackeron said: »
If this gives us a salary AH gems all the way!
Rooks said: »
Short of flagging edited posts for moderator review, I don't know how this could work. I get what you're asking, but I don't think I have any way to parse and evaluate English programmatically in a way that would achieve this.
Yeah, then add this. That'll make people think twice about your sweet gig.
Who can use and spell the correct your or you're?!
[+]
"Yous guys." Trump is in the ring, don't cha know?
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
Rooks said: »
- Do you have ideas for making it better?
When you close the particular thread, put some statistics:
# new posters posting in a P&R (Thanks for playing!)
# of posters topic-banned (no need to necessarily name & shame, unless desired)
# of reports (no need to break it down)
1 is doable, but I'd have to think about how to implement that in a way that wasn't total spaghetti.
2 and 3 are actually pretty easy (and I have tools that do some of that already), but I don't really want to do anything that might incentivize/gamify misbehavior.
[+]
Rooks said: »
2 and 3 are actually pretty easy (and I have tools that do some of that already), but I don't really want to do anything that might incentivize/gamify misbehavior.
Only problem I would see would be people intentionally trying to close a thread so you post said statistics.
Caitsith.Shiroi said: »
Give the ability to edit a post within 5 minutes or something like that?
Nevar! Your're no editin faeture is brillant Rooks brilliant!!!!!
[+]
All FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. FINAL
FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.